From understanding to agreement: The current state of informed consent in Nigerian endoscopic practice

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical endoscopic practice, ensuring that patients understand and agree to the procedures that they undergo. Despite its importance, studies suggest that variations in consent practices persist. There is also a paucity of information on endoscopic consent practices in sub-Saharan Africa. AIM: To investigate current practices around consent taking among endoscopists in Nigeria. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to September 2024 among endoscopists practicing in Nigeria. The participants completed a 32-part self-administered online questionnaire that documented the experiences of endoscopists concerning consent taking in endoscopy practice. These included the location of practice, awareness of legislation concerning informed consent in Nigeria, patient autonomy, various procedural risks discussed with patients, and challenges faced. At the end of the survey, the responses were analyzed using tables, pie charts, and figures. RESULTS: A total of 68 participants responded to the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 45.2 ± 6.6 years. There were 26 (38.2%) females and 42 (61.8%) males. Participants practicing in the northern part of the country comprised 41.1% (30) of the participants, while those practicing in southern Nigeria were 58.9% (38). Only 49.3% were aware of legislation about informed consent in Nigeria. The majority of the study participants (69.1%) gave the patients a few minutes to digest information before the procedure. A variety of risks were reported to be discussed, with abdominal discomfort being the most common (83.8%). The challenge to adequate consent was inadequate time for consent taking due to high patient burden (60.6%). CONCLUSION: Consent taking for endoscopy in Nigeria is not ideal; many healthcare workers only gave patients a few minutes to understand information about the procedure. To address this, training workshops and online webinars should be organized to train medical staff on how to do it properly. This will help improve patient care, ensure safety, and lead to better health results for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Methodology
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.109312
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From understanding to agreement: The current state of informed consent in Nigerian endoscopic practice

Nasiru Altine Dankiri, Kenechukwu Chukwuemeka Okonkwo, Chioma Francisca Udigwe, Emmanuel Obasi et al.
World Journal of Methodology
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

From understanding to agreement: The current state of informed consent in Nigerian endoscopic practice

Nasiru Altine Dankiri, Kenechukwu Chukwuemeka Okonkwo, Chioma Francisca Udigwe, Emmanuel Obasi, Winnifred Njideka Adiri, Uchenna Felicitas Okeke, Pantong Mark Davwar, Chinwe Philomena Onyia, Matthew O Bojuwoye, Shirley N Chukwurah, Stella-Maris C Egboh, Olutoyin I Asaolu, Yusuf Musa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical endoscopic practice, ensuring that patients understand and agree to the procedures that they undergo. Despite its importance, studies suggest that variations in consent practices persist. There is also a paucity of information on endoscopic consent practices in sub-Saharan Africa. AIM: To investigate current practices around consent taking among endoscopists in Nigeria. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to September 2024 among endoscopists practicing in Nigeria. The participants completed a 32-part self-administered online questionnaire that documented the experiences of endoscopists concerning consent taking in endoscopy practice. These included the location of practice, awareness of legislation concerning informed consent in Nigeria, patient autonomy, various procedural risks discussed with patients, and challenges faced. At the end of the survey, the responses were analyzed using tables, pie charts, and figures. RESULTS: A total of 68 participants responded to the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 45.2 ± 6.6 years. There were 26 (38.2%) females and 42 (61.8%) males. Participants practicing in the northern part of the country comprised 41.1% (30) of the participants, while those practicing in southern Nigeria were 58.9% (38). Only 49.3% were aware of legislation about informed consent in Nigeria. The majority of the study participants (69.1%) gave the patients a few minutes to digest information before the procedure. A variety of risks were reported to be discussed, with abdominal discomfort being the most common (83.8%). The challenge to adequate consent was inadequate time for consent taking due to high patient burden (60.6%). CONCLUSION: Consent taking for endoscopy in Nigeria is not ideal; many healthcare workers only gave patients a few minutes to understand information about the procedure. To address this, training workshops and online webinars should be organized to train medical staff on how to do it properly. This will help improve patient care, ensure safety, and lead to better health results for patients.

World Journal of MethodologyVol. 16(2)
University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (NG), Lagos University Teaching Hospital (NG), Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic (NG), Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto (NG), Federal Medical Centre (NG), Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NG), Jos University Teaching Hospital (NG), Federal Medical Centre (NG), University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (NG), Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki (NG), University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (NG), Usmanu Danfodiyo University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.