Educational Measurement with Emerging Technologies: A Systematic Review Through Evidentiary Lens on Granularity and Constructing Measures Theory
Emerging technologies (ETs), such as AI and reality techniques, are reshaping educational measurement. However, existing studies remain dispersed and are rarely synthesized in ways that clarify how ETs participate in the evidentiary work of educational measurement. Guided by PRISMA 2020, we systematically reviewed 933 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025 in formal educational settings. We coded studies by (a) grain size (micro, meso, macro), (b) Constructing Measures Theory building blocks (construct map, item design, outcome space, measurement model), and (c) ET category. Results showed a strong concentration at the micro level (88.88%) and in outcome space and measurement model work (86.80% combined), indicating that ET-enabled innovation has focused primarily on transforming performances into indicators and modeling those indicators for interpretation and decision-making. Learning analytics and educational data mining, machine learning and deep learning, and automated scoring and feedback systems were the dominant ET clusters. These findings point to an uneven development of ET-enabled educational measurement. Included studies also indicating recurring concerns about transparency, fairness, and governance are linked to the field’s main areas of ET-enabled concentration. We therefore argue for closer alignment among construct claims, evidence, modeling, and intended use, and offer implications for developers, researchers, and education practitioners.
Authors
- Gary K. W. Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-0734)
- F Wang
- Bingjie Zhang
- Linwei Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6808-254X)
Institutions
- Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Education Sciences
- Published
- 2026-04-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16040661
- Primary Topic
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00