Pre-commitment Runtime AI Oversight: A Framework for Timing, Proxies, and Intervention Feasibility

This paper presents a theory-first framework for runtime AI oversight centered on pre-commitment intervention timing. Its core claim is narrow: in systems with an auditable commitment protocol, pre-commitment monitoring can improve intervention success over an output-only baseline when proxy quality and end-to-end latency are adequate. The framework focuses on four load-bearing elements: monitoring cadence, proxy usefulness, retained intervention feasibility, and commitment-relevant escalation. It develops an intervention-oriented phase model—contact, attention, recognition, impulse, and commitment—and introduces a minimal runtime escalation score, V_s(t), for phase-sensitive monitoring. The manuscript is not presented as a universal predictive law of AI safety. It is a structured runtime-oversight scaffold intended to clarify timing, proxy limits, burden structure, calibration, and falsification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19700193
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-commitment Runtime AI Oversight: A Framework for Timing, Proxies, and Intervention Feasibility

Htet Ko Ko Naing
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Pre-commitment Runtime AI Oversight: A Framework for Timing, Proxies, and Intervention Feasibility

Htet Ko Ko Naing
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a theory-first framework for runtime AI oversight centered on pre-commitment intervention timing. Its core claim is narrow: in systems with an auditable commitment protocol, pre-commitment monitoring can improve intervention success over an output-only baseline when proxy quality and end-to-end latency are adequate. The framework focuses on four load-bearing elements: monitoring cadence, proxy usefulness, retained intervention feasibility, and commitment-relevant escalation. It develops an intervention-oriented phase model—contact, attention, recognition, impulse, and commitment—and introduces a minimal runtime escalation score, V_s(t), for phase-sensitive monitoring. The manuscript is not presented as a universal predictive law of AI safety. It is a structured runtime-oversight scaffold intended to clarify timing, proxy limits, burden structure, calibration, and falsification.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pre-commitment Runtime AI Oversight: A Framework for Timing, Proxies, and Intervention Feasibility — Htet Ko Ko Naing · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS