Assessing AI policy and guideline progress within the South African public higher education system: insights from documented policies

Abstract Recent years have witnessed transformative advancements in generative artificial intelligence, with profound implications for higher education. As universities increasingly integrate AI into teaching, learning, and research, there is an urgent need to craft policies that confront ethical challenges and promote its responsible use. This paper takes a first step towards developing a foundation for policy development by evaluating the current landscape of generative artificial intelligence policies across South African universities. Specifically, it examines how South African universities are beginning to govern the ethical use of generative AI in teaching and learning, by analysing the extent to which institutional guidelines embed core ethical principles. Drawing on four international AI-in-education frameworks, five ethical principles: transparency, accountability and responsibility, privacy, human agency and oversight, and inclusiveness and diversity were synthesised and used as a deductive coding frame for a qualitative document analysis of publicly available generative AI guidelines issued by South African universities, collected during February 2025. Only 46% of universities had institution-wide generative AI guidelines at the time of analysis, and ethical principles were unevenly operationalised. Transparency and student-centred accountability were strongly foregrounded through detailed expectations for disclosure and responsible use, whereas privacy, institutional data governance, staff accountability, and inclusiveness were addressed more briefly and often framed as advisory rather than enforceable obligations. The paper contributes to evolving discourse on higher education practice in the current era. The findings would enable actionable implications, providing a policy guideline for higher education, and the paper provides a national baseline of policy maturity regarding AI in education and a call for harmonised, privacy-by-design guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universal Access in the Information Society
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-026-01340-9
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing AI policy and guideline progress within the South African public higher education system: insights from documented policies

Mariam Jacobs-Basadien, Shaun Pather
Universal Access in the Information Society
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Assessing AI policy and guideline progress within the South African public higher education system: insights from documented policies

Mariam Jacobs-Basadien, Shaun Pather
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent years have witnessed transformative advancements in generative artificial intelligence, with profound implications for higher education. As universities increasingly integrate AI into teaching, learning, and research, there is an urgent need to craft policies that confront ethical challenges and promote its responsible use. This paper takes a first step towards developing a foundation for policy development by evaluating the current landscape of generative artificial intelligence policies across South African universities. Specifically, it examines how South African universities are beginning to govern the ethical use of generative AI in teaching and learning, by analysing the extent to which institutional guidelines embed core ethical principles. Drawing on four international AI-in-education frameworks, five ethical principles: transparency, accountability and responsibility, privacy, human agency and oversight, and inclusiveness and diversity were synthesised and used as a deductive coding frame for a qualitative document analysis of publicly available generative AI guidelines issued by South African universities, collected during February 2025. Only 46% of universities had institution-wide generative AI guidelines at the time of analysis, and ethical principles were unevenly operationalised. Transparency and student-centred accountability were strongly foregrounded through detailed expectations for disclosure and responsible use, whereas privacy, institutional data governance, staff accountability, and inclusiveness were addressed more briefly and often framed as advisory rather than enforceable obligations. The paper contributes to evolving discourse on higher education practice in the current era. The findings would enable actionable implications, providing a policy guideline for higher education, and the paper provides a national baseline of policy maturity regarding AI in education and a call for harmonised, privacy-by-design guidelines.

Universal Access in the Information SocietyVol. 25(2)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of the Western Cape (ZA)
University of the Western Cape
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.