Drugs, diet, or surgery? How treatment type and willpower shape responsibility for weight loss and judgments of the physician and treatment

Introduction Grounded in attribution theory and informed by the perspective on health moralization, this study examined how perceived lack of willpower shapes individuals’ judgments of responsibility for weight loss in individuals with obesity across different treatment methods (diet/exercise, bariatric surgery, and weight loss drugs). The study also investigated how willpower attributions and treatment type shape evaluations of the doctor, including trust, perceived credibility, and treatment acceptance. Methods and measures This study used an experimental vignette design in which the weight loss method (diet/exercise vs. bariatric surgery vs. weight loss drugs) was experimentally manipulated, and perceived lack of willpower was measured. The study included 183 adult participants ( M age = 29.3, SD = 10.98; 133 women). Results The moderation analyses revealed that perceived lack of willpower predicted lower responsibility for weight loss, but this effect was conditional on treatment type and emerged primarily in the weight loss drug condition. Across all conditions, treatment type had a robust effect: pharmacological treatments were consistently associated with lower perceived responsibility, lower trust in the doctor, lower perceived credibility, and lower treatment acceptance than surgery and diet/exercise. Perceived lack of willpower did not influence evaluations of the doctor or treatment. Conclusion These findings suggest that individuals rely on distinct judgment processes when evaluating both patients and treatment providers: responsibility attributions are shaped by dispositional beliefs about willpower, whereas evaluations of doctors and treatments are driven by treatment-related cues of effort and legitimacy. Understanding how treatment framing and beliefs about willpower interact may help clinicians communicate more effectively and foster trust in weight management interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1772798
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drugs, diet, or surgery? How treatment type and willpower shape responsibility for weight loss and judgments of the physician and treatment

Serena Petrocchi, Giulia Biaggini, Nicolò Zallocco
Frontiers in Psychology
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Drugs, diet, or surgery? How treatment type and willpower shape responsibility for weight loss and judgments of the physician and treatment

Serena Petrocchi, Giulia Biaggini, Nicolò Zallocco
article en

Abstract

Introduction Grounded in attribution theory and informed by the perspective on health moralization, this study examined how perceived lack of willpower shapes individuals’ judgments of responsibility for weight loss in individuals with obesity across different treatment methods (diet/exercise, bariatric surgery, and weight loss drugs). The study also investigated how willpower attributions and treatment type shape evaluations of the doctor, including trust, perceived credibility, and treatment acceptance. Methods and measures This study used an experimental vignette design in which the weight loss method (diet/exercise vs. bariatric surgery vs. weight loss drugs) was experimentally manipulated, and perceived lack of willpower was measured. The study included 183 adult participants ( M age = 29.3, SD = 10.98; 133 women). Results The moderation analyses revealed that perceived lack of willpower predicted lower responsibility for weight loss, but this effect was conditional on treatment type and emerged primarily in the weight loss drug condition. Across all conditions, treatment type had a robust effect: pharmacological treatments were consistently associated with lower perceived responsibility, lower trust in the doctor, lower perceived credibility, and lower treatment acceptance than surgery and diet/exercise. Perceived lack of willpower did not influence evaluations of the doctor or treatment. Conclusion These findings suggest that individuals rely on distinct judgment processes when evaluating both patients and treatment providers: responsibility attributions are shaped by dispositional beliefs about willpower, whereas evaluations of doctors and treatments are driven by treatment-related cues of effort and legitimacy. Understanding how treatment framing and beliefs about willpower interact may help clinicians communicate more effectively and foster trust in weight management interventions.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Drugs, diet, or surgery? How treatment type and willpower shape responsibility for weight loss and judgments of the physician and treatment — Serena Petrocchi, Giulia Biaggini, et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS