Comparative effectiveness of parenteral anticoagulants (fondaparinux, argatroban, bivalirudin) in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe immune adverse drug reaction that requires stopping heparin and starting other types of anticoagulation. The comparative effectiveness of intravenous anticoagulants remains uncertain. AIM: To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux with that of argatroban and bivalirudin in patients who have been suspected or confirmed to have had HIT. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature has been conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases were searched until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the parenteral anticoagulant in patients with HIT were included. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers, based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Evidence certainty was conducted using the GRADE method. RESULTS: The 2867 patients with HIT were identified in 16 of the studies that comprised this review (1 RCT, 15 RCTs). Limited head-to-head evidence was available from the single RCT. Across the studies, thrombotic events occurred at rates of 5%-15% and major bleeding at rates of 5%-15%. Research has shown differences in anticoagulation efficiency, with methodological differences being significant. Fondaparinux's safety characteristics were found favorable in retrospective reviews, whereas argatroban and bivalirudin displayed similar efficacy characteristics. The evidence certainty was classified as low to very low due to study design limitations and inconsistencies among key outcomes. CONCLUSION: = 2867), no single anticoagulant agent was definitively superior, and the certainty level of all outcomes was low to very low. Observational evidence and its methodological heterogeneity do not allow for ranking the treatment in an evidence-based treatment. Well-designed RCT are needed to guide in selecting the best anticoagulant to use in patients with HIT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Methodology
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.113265
Primary Topic
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness of parenteral anticoagulants (fondaparinux, argatroban, bivalirudin) in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A systematic review

Inshal Jawed, Mehsim Abid, Kiran Lohana, M Sharaf et al.
World Journal of Methodology
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
article

Comparative effectiveness of parenteral anticoagulants (fondaparinux, argatroban, bivalirudin) in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A systematic review

Inshal Jawed, Mehsim Abid, Kiran Lohana, M Sharaf, Bhawna Lohana, Sadia Siddique, FNU Nasrullah, Abdul Rehman, Fnu Sapna, Hira Jamil, Mohammad Tufail, Sagar Parkash
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe immune adverse drug reaction that requires stopping heparin and starting other types of anticoagulation. The comparative effectiveness of intravenous anticoagulants remains uncertain. AIM: To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux with that of argatroban and bivalirudin in patients who have been suspected or confirmed to have had HIT. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature has been conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases were searched until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the parenteral anticoagulant in patients with HIT were included. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers, based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Evidence certainty was conducted using the GRADE method. RESULTS: The 2867 patients with HIT were identified in 16 of the studies that comprised this review (1 RCT, 15 RCTs). Limited head-to-head evidence was available from the single RCT. Across the studies, thrombotic events occurred at rates of 5%-15% and major bleeding at rates of 5%-15%. Research has shown differences in anticoagulation efficiency, with methodological differences being significant. Fondaparinux's safety characteristics were found favorable in retrospective reviews, whereas argatroban and bivalirudin displayed similar efficacy characteristics. The evidence certainty was classified as low to very low due to study design limitations and inconsistencies among key outcomes. CONCLUSION: = 2867), no single anticoagulant agent was definitively superior, and the certainty level of all outcomes was low to very low. Observational evidence and its methodological heterogeneity do not allow for ranking the treatment in an evidence-based treatment. Well-designed RCT are needed to guide in selecting the best anticoagulant to use in patients with HIT.

World Journal of MethodologyVol. 16(2)
Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (PK), Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK), Punjab Medical College (PK), Government of Pakistan (PK), Bahawal Victoria Hospital (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.