Efficacy and safety of BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy in extramedullary relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

Background: This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with extramedullary disease (EMD). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to December 2024 reporting CAR T-cell therapy in RRMM patients with EMD. Studies were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and the methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the MINORS tool; one low-quality study was excluded. A total of 42 studies were included, comprising 242 RRMM patients with EMD and 1,485 without EMD. Fixed- or random-effects models were applied to pool effect sizes. Primary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Results: The pooled ORR and CR rates were 79% (95%CI: 71%-86%) and 42% (95%CI: 32%-51%) in the EMD group, and 90% (95%CI: 86%-93%) and 49% (95%CI: 40%-58%) in the non-EMD group, respectively. Reported median PFS ranged from 3 to 18.8 months in the EMD grouPand from 1 to 38 months in the non-EMD group, while median OS ranged from 6 to 13.9 months and from 12.2 to 38 months, respectively. The pooled incidences of grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS were 18% (95%CI: 8%-27%) and 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in the EMD group, compared with 13% (95%CI: 7%-19%) and 6% (95%CI: 2%-9%) in the non-EMD group; none of the differences were statistically significant (P> 0.05). Due to inconsistent reporting and lack of individual patient-level data, hazard ratios and pooled time-to-event analyses were not feasible. Conclusion: Although RRMM patients with EMD exhibited lower ORR and CR rates than those without EMD, BCMA-directed CAR T therapy demonstrated notable clinical activity with a manageable safety profile. However, no direct comparisons with conventional therapies were performed in this analysis. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42025613422, identifier CRD42025613422.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1792558
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy in extramedullary relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

Dan Chen, Jiajia Li, Hao Yao, Shi-hui Ren et al.
Frontiers in Immunology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Efficacy and safety of BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy in extramedullary relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

Dan Chen, Jiajia Li, Hao Yao, Shi-hui Ren, Fang-yi Fan, Jian-chun Fan, Meng-jiao Li, Cai-yang Li, Ying He, Yan-ling Li, Ling Qiu
article en

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with extramedullary disease (EMD). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to December 2024 reporting CAR T-cell therapy in RRMM patients with EMD. Studies were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and the methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the MINORS tool; one low-quality study was excluded. A total of 42 studies were included, comprising 242 RRMM patients with EMD and 1,485 without EMD. Fixed- or random-effects models were applied to pool effect sizes. Primary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Results: The pooled ORR and CR rates were 79% (95%CI: 71%-86%) and 42% (95%CI: 32%-51%) in the EMD group, and 90% (95%CI: 86%-93%) and 49% (95%CI: 40%-58%) in the non-EMD group, respectively. Reported median PFS ranged from 3 to 18.8 months in the EMD grouPand from 1 to 38 months in the non-EMD group, while median OS ranged from 6 to 13.9 months and from 12.2 to 38 months, respectively. The pooled incidences of grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS were 18% (95%CI: 8%-27%) and 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in the EMD group, compared with 13% (95%CI: 7%-19%) and 6% (95%CI: 2%-9%) in the non-EMD group; none of the differences were statistically significant (P> 0.05). Due to inconsistent reporting and lack of individual patient-level data, hazard ratios and pooled time-to-event analyses were not feasible. Conclusion: Although RRMM patients with EMD exhibited lower ORR and CR rates than those without EMD, BCMA-directed CAR T therapy demonstrated notable clinical activity with a manageable safety profile. However, no direct comparisons with conventional therapies were performed in this analysis. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42025613422, identifier CRD42025613422.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
North Sichuan Medical University (CN), Hebei North University (CN), Chinese General Hospital College of Nursing and Liberal Arts (PH), Advanced Tissue (United States) (US), First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.