Prevalence of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILAs) in Italian Lung Cancer Screening Programs: A Monocentric Study

Background: Because of the increased awareness of the clinical importance of ILAs on chest CT, this study aims to determine the prevalence of ILAs in an Italian health cohort undergoing CT for a lung cancer screening (LCS) program and quantify ILA using both visual and deep learning-based analyses. Methods: In this observational, retrospective monocentric study, 500 participants (ITALUNG2, n = 100; RISP, n = 400) underwent low-dose CT (CTDI < 2mGy). Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the images and determined the presence and extent of ILAs, classifying them as fibrotic or non-fibrotic, while a lung texture analysis was performed by using commercially available deep learning–based software. Results: ILAs were present in 34 patients (11 females and 23 males), with a prevalence of 6,8%, with similar rates across both screening cohorts taken individually. Interobserver agreement between radiologists was almost perfect, whereas concordance between visual and automated quantification was substantial. Visual assessment tended to yield higher estimates of ILA extent compared with software-based analysis. Conclusions: These findings confirm that ILAs are relatively common in LCS populations and highlight the importance of their detection and characterization, particularly for fibrotic patterns. Differences between visual and automated approaches underline the need for further refinement and validation of quantitative tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093193
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILAs) in Italian Lung Cancer Screening Programs: A Monocentric Study

Caterina Giannessi, E Cavigli, Diletta Cozzi, Chiara Moroni et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prevalence of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILAs) in Italian Lung Cancer Screening Programs: A Monocentric Study

Caterina Giannessi, E Cavigli, Diletta Cozzi, Chiara Moroni, Giulia Picozzi, Katia Ferrari, Luca Gozzi, Vittorio Miele
article en

Abstract

Background: Because of the increased awareness of the clinical importance of ILAs on chest CT, this study aims to determine the prevalence of ILAs in an Italian health cohort undergoing CT for a lung cancer screening (LCS) program and quantify ILA using both visual and deep learning-based analyses. Methods: In this observational, retrospective monocentric study, 500 participants (ITALUNG2, n = 100; RISP, n = 400) underwent low-dose CT (CTDI < 2mGy). Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the images and determined the presence and extent of ILAs, classifying them as fibrotic or non-fibrotic, while a lung texture analysis was performed by using commercially available deep learning–based software. Results: ILAs were present in 34 patients (11 females and 23 males), with a prevalence of 6,8%, with similar rates across both screening cohorts taken individually. Interobserver agreement between radiologists was almost perfect, whereas concordance between visual and automated quantification was substantial. Visual assessment tended to yield higher estimates of ILA extent compared with software-based analysis. Conclusions: These findings confirm that ILAs are relatively common in LCS populations and highlight the importance of their detection and characterization, particularly for fibrotic patterns. Differences between visual and automated approaches underline the need for further refinement and validation of quantitative tools.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(9)
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.