Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics in multiple myeloma: a systematic review of prognostic biomarkers and minimal residual disease monitoring

Introduction: Current multiple myeloma (MM) risk stratification, anchored on the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), provides a static snapshot of disease but fails to capture its dynamic biological evolution, functional tumor-microenvironment crosstalk, and real-time treatment response. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic and metabolomic profiling has emerged as a high-sensitivity tool for both novel biomarker discovery and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This systematic review evaluates the independent prognostic value and clinical utility of quantitative MS-based proteomics and metabolomics compared to standard-of-care risk models and traditional disease monitoring techniques. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. Inclusion required quantitative MS-based proteomics or metabolomics in MM cohorts with outcomes compared to ISS/R-ISS or traditional MRD detection methods. Data analysis was performed with a focus on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hazard ratios (HR), and MRD sensitivity thresholds. Results: From 1,077 records, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven discovery-focused studies identified specific MS-derived signatures, such as microenvironmental proteins (e.g., MTA2, CD44) and dysregulated lipid metabolites (e.g., acylcarnitines, LysoPE) that were consistently associated with PFS and OS. Crucially, MS-based biomarkers retained independent prognostic significance in multivariate models adjusted for R-ISS. Furthermore, 8 studies tackling blood-based MS-MRD detection demonstrated up to 1,000-fold higher sensitivity than traditional immunofixation electrophoresis, identified biochemical relapse 2-11 months earlier, and achieved high concordance with bone marrow-based assays (NGS/NGF). Conclusion: In conclusion, quantitative MS profiling provides a high-resolution molecular lens that significantly refines MM risk stratification beyond static staging. By enabling non-invasive, longitudinal MRD monitoring with superior lead times, MS integration facilitates a shift from reactive to proactive intervention. Standardization of bioinformatics pipelines and MS methodologies is now the final barrier to implementing MS-guided treatment adjustments in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1791030
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics in multiple myeloma: a systematic review of prognostic biomarkers and minimal residual disease monitoring

Muhammad Raihan Sajid, Naseel Moursy, Zainab Nasir, Hibba Siraj et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics in multiple myeloma: a systematic review of prognostic biomarkers and minimal residual disease monitoring

Muhammad Raihan Sajid, Naseel Moursy, Zainab Nasir, Hibba Siraj, Affaf Tanweer
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Current multiple myeloma (MM) risk stratification, anchored on the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), provides a static snapshot of disease but fails to capture its dynamic biological evolution, functional tumor-microenvironment crosstalk, and real-time treatment response. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic and metabolomic profiling has emerged as a high-sensitivity tool for both novel biomarker discovery and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This systematic review evaluates the independent prognostic value and clinical utility of quantitative MS-based proteomics and metabolomics compared to standard-of-care risk models and traditional disease monitoring techniques. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. Inclusion required quantitative MS-based proteomics or metabolomics in MM cohorts with outcomes compared to ISS/R-ISS or traditional MRD detection methods. Data analysis was performed with a focus on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hazard ratios (HR), and MRD sensitivity thresholds. Results: From 1,077 records, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven discovery-focused studies identified specific MS-derived signatures, such as microenvironmental proteins (e.g., MTA2, CD44) and dysregulated lipid metabolites (e.g., acylcarnitines, LysoPE) that were consistently associated with PFS and OS. Crucially, MS-based biomarkers retained independent prognostic significance in multivariate models adjusted for R-ISS. Furthermore, 8 studies tackling blood-based MS-MRD detection demonstrated up to 1,000-fold higher sensitivity than traditional immunofixation electrophoresis, identified biochemical relapse 2-11 months earlier, and achieved high concordance with bone marrow-based assays (NGS/NGF). Conclusion: In conclusion, quantitative MS profiling provides a high-resolution molecular lens that significantly refines MM risk stratification beyond static staging. By enabling non-invasive, longitudinal MRD monitoring with superior lead times, MS integration facilitates a shift from reactive to proactive intervention. Standardization of bioinformatics pipelines and MS methodologies is now the final barrier to implementing MS-guided treatment adjustments in routine clinical practice.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Alfaisal University (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.