Poor Journalism as a Distinct Phenomenon from Disinformation: Definition and Taxonomy

Disinformation has become one of the main contemporary social and political concerns. However, both public and academic debates continue to exhibit an epistemological confusion between disinformation—characterized by a deliberate intention to deceive—and the errors or deficiencies arising from journalistic practice. The aim of this study is to conceptually define these errors under the phenomenon of poor journalism and to propose a taxonomy that allows it to be examined as distinct from disinformation. To this end, a qualitative integrative systematic review was conducted, based on the inductive analysis of peer-reviewed academic publications in Spanish and English, indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO Host. The analysis identifies two main analytical dimensions: deficient practices and structural causes. The findings show that poor journalism does not stem from a deliberate intention to deceive, but rather from structural factors, commercial logics, and corporate interests within the media ecosystem. This phenomenon is intensified by a circular logic in which the same causes that generate it also reinforce it. This study helps to clarify a relevant conceptual gap by offering a definition and a taxonomy that may be used in future research and media literacy initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism and Media
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7020087
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poor Journalism as a Distinct Phenomenon from Disinformation: Definition and Taxonomy

Marta Saavedra, Ernesto Garcia-Ojeda
Journalism and Media
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Poor Journalism as a Distinct Phenomenon from Disinformation: Definition and Taxonomy

Marta Saavedra, Ernesto Garcia-Ojeda
article en

Abstract

Disinformation has become one of the main contemporary social and political concerns. However, both public and academic debates continue to exhibit an epistemological confusion between disinformation—characterized by a deliberate intention to deceive—and the errors or deficiencies arising from journalistic practice. The aim of this study is to conceptually define these errors under the phenomenon of poor journalism and to propose a taxonomy that allows it to be examined as distinct from disinformation. To this end, a qualitative integrative systematic review was conducted, based on the inductive analysis of peer-reviewed academic publications in Spanish and English, indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO Host. The analysis identifies two main analytical dimensions: deficient practices and structural causes. The findings show that poor journalism does not stem from a deliberate intention to deceive, but rather from structural factors, commercial logics, and corporate interests within the media ecosystem. This phenomenon is intensified by a circular logic in which the same causes that generate it also reinforce it. This study helps to clarify a relevant conceptual gap by offering a definition and a taxonomy that may be used in future research and media literacy initiatives.

Journalism and MediaVol. 7(2)
Universidad Nebrija (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.