Decision-Making in Private Equity and Private Credit: An Integrative Review

Private capital decisions—across private equity and private credit—shape innovation, firm transformation, and capital allocation. Yet, how investors decide remains underintegrated across theories and methods. Scholarship has developed along three metatheoretical traditions—economic rationality, social embeddedness, and psychological boundedness—and has relied heavily on factor–outcome designs, making it difficult to distinguish durable mechanisms from behavioral bias or context-bound artifacts. We review 936 articles spanning more than 80 years. We synthesize them into a staged, multilevel framework that maps the three logics to core modules: investors’ strategies and characteristics; decision-making cues and approaches; mechanisms; decision focus (selection, structuring, portfolio management, and exit); performance and broader implications; and external contingencies. This integrative lens organizes what is known—clarifying which factors matter, through which mechanisms, and under what conditions—and specifies how the logics that jointly govern private capital decision-making might act as complements or substitutes. In doing so, it provides a common architecture for a more cumulative research program on private capital and a template for studying judgment under uncertainty more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Annals
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2024.0292
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-Making in Private Equity and Private Credit: An Integrative Review

Elena Novelli, Andrea Pignataro
Academy of Management Annals
Private Equity and Venture Capital
article

Decision-Making in Private Equity and Private Credit: An Integrative Review

Elena Novelli, Andrea Pignataro
article en

Abstract

Private capital decisions—across private equity and private credit—shape innovation, firm transformation, and capital allocation. Yet, how investors decide remains underintegrated across theories and methods. Scholarship has developed along three metatheoretical traditions—economic rationality, social embeddedness, and psychological boundedness—and has relied heavily on factor–outcome designs, making it difficult to distinguish durable mechanisms from behavioral bias or context-bound artifacts. We review 936 articles spanning more than 80 years. We synthesize them into a staged, multilevel framework that maps the three logics to core modules: investors’ strategies and characteristics; decision-making cues and approaches; mechanisms; decision focus (selection, structuring, portfolio management, and exit); performance and broader implications; and external contingencies. This integrative lens organizes what is known—clarifying which factors matter, through which mechanisms, and under what conditions—and specifies how the logics that jointly govern private capital decision-making might act as complements or substitutes. In doing so, it provides a common architecture for a more cumulative research program on private capital and a template for studying judgment under uncertainty more broadly.

Academy of Management Annals
IAC Group (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.