Rethinking Urban Intersections for Sustainable Micro-Mobility: A Kinematic Comparison of E-Scooters and Bicycles at Mini-Roundabouts

Urban roundabouts present significant design challenges for the integration of micro-mobility, yet comparative evidence regarding user behavior remains limited. As cities transition toward sustainable transport networks, understanding the operational needs of different micromobility modes is essential for urban planning. This study investigates the dynamic strategies of micromobility users through a controlled field experiment at a mini-roundabout in Gravina di Catania, Italy. Twenty experienced riders executed crossings using conventional bicycles and electric scooters. Utilizing drone recordings and open-source tracking, the analysis extracted speed, longitudinal acceleration, and path radius across 80 maneuvers. The findings reveal that behavior is highly dependent on vehicle type and geometric deflection. On highly deflected trajectories, e-scooters selected wider radii and achieved up to 15% higher speeds and accelerations than bicycles, whereas on gentler trajectories, they adopted more conservative, tighter lines with intense braking. Bicycles exhibited smaller, less systematic adjustments. These significant kinematic differences indicate that bicycles and e-scooters possess distinct performance envelopes. Treating them as a single legal or design class obscures stability disparities influencing conflict risk. Ultimately, this research provides empirical insights to guide urban planners in redesigning intersections, emphasizing that tailored infrastructure and targeted speed management are critical steps toward safer, truly sustainable urban mobility.