Mapping Power: A Landscape Approach to Etruscan Urbanisation and Territorial Control

Etruscan studies have reached great heights in the accumulation of cultural data. This is particularly true for landscape studies: the second half of the 20th century has been fruitful as it saw a growth in survey projects exploring ancient central Italian landscapes. Survey data indeed have a lot of potential for the study of urbanisation, facilitating the quantification of different patterns to draw comparisons of control strategies enacted by different power places. This paper is a synthesis of the analyses on rural settlement data between the 7th and the 5th centuries BCE, when urbanised institutions and lifestyles consolidated. Four case studies are selected and discussed, representing different types of territorial control: Tuscania, a mid-ranking centre tied to the city of Tarquinia; Chiusi and Cerveteri, both urban central places, with different developments and ways to administer territories; and finally, the palatial site of Murlo, in open conflict with urbanised realities. Site trends, proxies of population change and locational analysis, using GIS, reveal different rural infrastructures sustaining Etruscan central places. These centres adopted different strategies to control their lands and benefit from them. As part of the approach, I will show how structured Etruscan landscapes became, how they were exploited, who lived there, and how relationships with the central place were developed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15050699
Primary Topic
Historical and Architectural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Power: A Landscape Approach to Etruscan Urbanisation and Territorial Control

Camilla Zeviani
Land
Historical and Architectural Studies
article

Mapping Power: A Landscape Approach to Etruscan Urbanisation and Territorial Control

Camilla Zeviani
article en

Abstract

Etruscan studies have reached great heights in the accumulation of cultural data. This is particularly true for landscape studies: the second half of the 20th century has been fruitful as it saw a growth in survey projects exploring ancient central Italian landscapes. Survey data indeed have a lot of potential for the study of urbanisation, facilitating the quantification of different patterns to draw comparisons of control strategies enacted by different power places. This paper is a synthesis of the analyses on rural settlement data between the 7th and the 5th centuries BCE, when urbanised institutions and lifestyles consolidated. Four case studies are selected and discussed, representing different types of territorial control: Tuscania, a mid-ranking centre tied to the city of Tarquinia; Chiusi and Cerveteri, both urban central places, with different developments and ways to administer territories; and finally, the palatial site of Murlo, in open conflict with urbanised realities. Site trends, proxies of population change and locational analysis, using GIS, reveal different rural infrastructures sustaining Etruscan central places. These centres adopted different strategies to control their lands and benefit from them. As part of the approach, I will show how structured Etruscan landscapes became, how they were exploited, who lived there, and how relationships with the central place were developed.

LandVol. 15(5)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical and Architectural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.