Dialectical Behavior Therapy vs Schema Therapy for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

Importance: Head-to-head comparisons of evidence-based treatments for borderline personality disorder (BPD), including dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and schema therapy (ST), remain scarce, despite their widely recognized relevance. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of DBT and ST in a multicenter trial among outpatients with BPD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 3-year multicenter superiority randomized clinical trial (RCT), part of the BOOTS (Borderline Optimal Treatment Selection) project, was conducted between January 2019 and April 2025. The trial was conducted in 9 Dutch outpatient centers among individuals aged 18 to 65 years with BPD. Assessments were administered by assessors blinded to treatment allocation. Interventions: Participants were randomized to DBT or ST via computerized covariate-adaptive randomization accounting for sex and BPD severity. Both treatments were delivered over 2 years in a combined group-individual format. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of change in DSM-5 BPD severity from baseline to 1-year posttreatment follow-up (3 years after baseline), assessed by the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fifth version (BPDSI-5) total score. Secondary outcomes included DSM-5 BPD criteria, general symptom severity, functioning, quality of life, well-being, sleep problems, and treatment dropout. Results: Of 204 participants (172 female [84.3%]; mean [SD] age, 32.21 [9.57] years), 95 (46.6%) received DBT and 109 (53.4%) received ST. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference between DBT and ST in reducing BPD severity (P = .27, r = 0.09), with large improvements in both treatments. At 36-month follow-up, the estimated mean difference was -1.09 on the BPDSI-5 (Cohen d = 0.15; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.47). No significant differences between treatments were observed on any secondary outcome, with marked improvements over time in both treatments. Dropout did not differ significantly (DBT: 34% at 1 year, 52% at 2 years; ST: 29% at 1 year, 46% at 2 years). Conclusions and Relevance: This multicenter RCT found no significant differences in effectiveness between DBT and ST for outpatients with BPD, with substantial improvements across outcomes. Future research is warranted to assess equivalence and to determine which treatment works best for whom and why. Trial Registration: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl Identifier: NL-OMON49443.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.0418
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialectical Behavior Therapy vs Schema Therapy for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

Annemieke Koppeschaar, Jan Henk Kamphuis, Marieke Alkema, Maria Ploegmakers et al.
JAMA Psychiatry
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Dialectical Behavior Therapy vs Schema Therapy for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

Annemieke Koppeschaar, Jan Henk Kamphuis, Marieke Alkema, Maria Ploegmakers, Jet Alberts, Roland Sinnaeve, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Eliane C.P. Dek, Chrissy James, Rachel J. Schuur, Monique Hupkes, Carlijn J. M. Wibbelink, Marieke van Vliet, Arnoud Arntz
article en

Abstract

Importance: Head-to-head comparisons of evidence-based treatments for borderline personality disorder (BPD), including dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and schema therapy (ST), remain scarce, despite their widely recognized relevance. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of DBT and ST in a multicenter trial among outpatients with BPD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 3-year multicenter superiority randomized clinical trial (RCT), part of the BOOTS (Borderline Optimal Treatment Selection) project, was conducted between January 2019 and April 2025. The trial was conducted in 9 Dutch outpatient centers among individuals aged 18 to 65 years with BPD. Assessments were administered by assessors blinded to treatment allocation. Interventions: Participants were randomized to DBT or ST via computerized covariate-adaptive randomization accounting for sex and BPD severity. Both treatments were delivered over 2 years in a combined group-individual format. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of change in DSM-5 BPD severity from baseline to 1-year posttreatment follow-up (3 years after baseline), assessed by the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fifth version (BPDSI-5) total score. Secondary outcomes included DSM-5 BPD criteria, general symptom severity, functioning, quality of life, well-being, sleep problems, and treatment dropout. Results: Of 204 participants (172 female [84.3%]; mean [SD] age, 32.21 [9.57] years), 95 (46.6%) received DBT and 109 (53.4%) received ST. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference between DBT and ST in reducing BPD severity (P = .27, r = 0.09), with large improvements in both treatments. At 36-month follow-up, the estimated mean difference was -1.09 on the BPDSI-5 (Cohen d = 0.15; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.47). No significant differences between treatments were observed on any secondary outcome, with marked improvements over time in both treatments. Dropout did not differ significantly (DBT: 34% at 1 year, 52% at 2 years; ST: 29% at 1 year, 46% at 2 years). Conclusions and Relevance: This multicenter RCT found no significant differences in effectiveness between DBT and ST for outpatients with BPD, with substantial improvements across outcomes. Future research is warranted to assess equivalence and to determine which treatment works best for whom and why. Trial Registration: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl Identifier: NL-OMON49443.

JAMA Psychiatry
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord (NL), PsyQ (NL), Antes (NL), Zorginstituut Nederland (NL), GGZ Rivierduinen (NL), GGZ inGeest (NL), Pro Persona (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.