Vitamins and Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiologic and Clinical Evidence

Introduction. Vitamin supplementation nearly is universal among patients with cancer, yet the scientific landscape is far more complex. Across decades of research, vitamins have demonstrated profound biological effects ranging from immune activation and ferroptosis modulation to paradoxical tumor promotion. Objective: This scoping review maps the breadth of compelling and controversial evidence surrounding vitamins A, D, E, K, C, and the B-complex in cancer prevention, treatment response, and toxicity. Methods. Guided by PRISMA-ScR domains, we synthesized mechanistic studies, epidemiologic cohorts, randomized trials, and therapeutic investigations addressing vitamins in the oncology context. Eligibility focused on sources examining cancer risk, progression, treatment interactions, or toxicity. Results. Several vitamins exhibit striking anticancer mechanisms: vitamin K2 triggers autophagy-driven leukemia cell death; pharmacologic vitamin C selectively kills KRAS- and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer cells; niacin reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment; and vitamin D enhances microbiome-dependent antitumor immunity. Yet the review also identifies potential harms, including beta-carotene increasing lung cancer risk in smokers, vitamin E raising prostate cancer risk, and antioxidant supplementation potentially weakening the oxidative mechanisms essential for chemotherapy and radiotherapy efficacy. Dose-response patterns frequently are U-shaped, with both deficiency and excess linked to greater risk. High-dose intravenous vitamin C, vitamin D repletion during immunotherapy, and vitamin-targeted nanoparticles emerge as promising but unproven therapeutic strategies. Conclusions. Across vitamins, benefits appear highly context-dependent. Routine supplementation is unsupported, while targeted correction of true deficiencies remains essential. This rapidly evolving field demands individualized decision-making and rigorously designed trials to define when vitamins act as allies, and when they become adversaries, in cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kansas Journal of Medicine
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol19.25377
Primary Topic
Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vitamins and Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiologic and Clinical Evidence

Ammar Al‐Obaidi, Marcel Katrib, Anthony Albayeh, Janane Nasr et al.
Kansas Journal of Medicine
Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
article

Vitamins and Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiologic and Clinical Evidence

Ammar Al‐Obaidi, Marcel Katrib, Anthony Albayeh, Janane Nasr, Laura El Halabi, Alexandre Khoury
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Vitamin supplementation nearly is universal among patients with cancer, yet the scientific landscape is far more complex. Across decades of research, vitamins have demonstrated profound biological effects ranging from immune activation and ferroptosis modulation to paradoxical tumor promotion. Objective: This scoping review maps the breadth of compelling and controversial evidence surrounding vitamins A, D, E, K, C, and the B-complex in cancer prevention, treatment response, and toxicity. Methods. Guided by PRISMA-ScR domains, we synthesized mechanistic studies, epidemiologic cohorts, randomized trials, and therapeutic investigations addressing vitamins in the oncology context. Eligibility focused on sources examining cancer risk, progression, treatment interactions, or toxicity. Results. Several vitamins exhibit striking anticancer mechanisms: vitamin K2 triggers autophagy-driven leukemia cell death; pharmacologic vitamin C selectively kills KRAS- and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer cells; niacin reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment; and vitamin D enhances microbiome-dependent antitumor immunity. Yet the review also identifies potential harms, including beta-carotene increasing lung cancer risk in smokers, vitamin E raising prostate cancer risk, and antioxidant supplementation potentially weakening the oxidative mechanisms essential for chemotherapy and radiotherapy efficacy. Dose-response patterns frequently are U-shaped, with both deficiency and excess linked to greater risk. High-dose intravenous vitamin C, vitamin D repletion during immunotherapy, and vitamin-targeted nanoparticles emerge as promising but unproven therapeutic strategies. Conclusions. Across vitamins, benefits appear highly context-dependent. Routine supplementation is unsupported, while targeted correction of true deficiencies remains essential. This rapidly evolving field demands individualized decision-making and rigorously designed trials to define when vitamins act as allies, and when they become adversaries, in cancer care.

Kansas Journal of MedicineVol. 19(S1)
University of Kansas (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.