Chokepoint Convergence: A Geospatial Mixed-Methods Analysis of Multi-Domain Coordination in Operation Epic Fury

Multi-domain operations (MDO) doctrine has been the centerpiece of U.S. military modernization since 2018, yet Operation Epic Fury (February 28–April 8, 2026) provided the first large-scale empirical test of MDO concepts against a state adversary. This study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design combining quantitative geospatial analysis with qualitative directed content analysis to examine how U.S. forces achieved multi-domain convergence to neutralize threats and control the Strait of Hormuz. The quantitative strand applied Getis-Ord Gi* hot spot analysis, kernel density estimation, space-time pattern mining, and proximity analysis to a georeferenced database of 71 strikes, 36 ships attacked, 15 maritime traffic observations, and 22 satellite damage assessments. The qualitative strand analyzed 34 official documents—operational communications, doctrinal publications, and Congressional testimony—using a 42-code framework with inter-coder reliability of κ = 0.81. Integration through joint display matrices yielded three overarching findings. First, operations exhibited a bimodal spatial distribution with a dominant Tehran hot spot (43.1% of strikes, z = 4.23, p < .001) and a secondary Bushehr–Bandar Abbas coastal cluster (29.2%, z = 3.87, p < .001), producing a discontiguous convergence zone spanning 790 kilometers. Second, the Strait of Hormuz functioned as a “strategic attractor,” with strike density 12.8 times greater than expected within 100 kilometers and a southward migration of the operational mean center from 32.59°N to 30.71°N. Third, convergence across domains was sequential rather than simultaneous, with air operations self-enabling on Day 1 while maritime effectiveness depended on prior air superiority, revealing a domain hierarchy inconsistent with MDO doctrine’s domain equivalence assumption. Sustainment emerged as the binding constraint, with 3 of 4 analytic dimensions convergent but logistics rated only as complementary. These findings advance a geographic convergence model that reorients MDO theory from technology-centric to geography-centric coordination, with implications for doctrine development, operational planning, and defense investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19698915
Primary Topic
Military Strategy and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chokepoint Convergence: A Geospatial Mixed-Methods Analysis of Multi-Domain Coordination in Operation Epic Fury

Laszlo Pokorny
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Military Strategy and Technology
article

Chokepoint Convergence: A Geospatial Mixed-Methods Analysis of Multi-Domain Coordination in Operation Epic Fury

Laszlo Pokorny
article en

Abstract

Multi-domain operations (MDO) doctrine has been the centerpiece of U.S. military modernization since 2018, yet Operation Epic Fury (February 28–April 8, 2026) provided the first large-scale empirical test of MDO concepts against a state adversary. This study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design combining quantitative geospatial analysis with qualitative directed content analysis to examine how U.S. forces achieved multi-domain convergence to neutralize threats and control the Strait of Hormuz. The quantitative strand applied Getis-Ord Gi* hot spot analysis, kernel density estimation, space-time pattern mining, and proximity analysis to a georeferenced database of 71 strikes, 36 ships attacked, 15 maritime traffic observations, and 22 satellite damage assessments. The qualitative strand analyzed 34 official documents—operational communications, doctrinal publications, and Congressional testimony—using a 42-code framework with inter-coder reliability of κ = 0.81. Integration through joint display matrices yielded three overarching findings. First, operations exhibited a bimodal spatial distribution with a dominant Tehran hot spot (43.1% of strikes, z = 4.23, p < .001) and a secondary Bushehr–Bandar Abbas coastal cluster (29.2%, z = 3.87, p < .001), producing a discontiguous convergence zone spanning 790 kilometers. Second, the Strait of Hormuz functioned as a “strategic attractor,” with strike density 12.8 times greater than expected within 100 kilometers and a southward migration of the operational mean center from 32.59°N to 30.71°N. Third, convergence across domains was sequential rather than simultaneous, with air operations self-enabling on Day 1 while maritime effectiveness depended on prior air superiority, revealing a domain hierarchy inconsistent with MDO doctrine’s domain equivalence assumption. Sustainment emerged as the binding constraint, with 3 of 4 analytic dimensions convergent but logistics rated only as complementary. These findings advance a geographic convergence model that reorients MDO theory from technology-centric to geography-centric coordination, with implications for doctrine development, operational planning, and defense investment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Fujitsu (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Military Strategy and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.