Context-dependent asymmetries in intertemporal decision-making: a comparative study of substance use disorder and control groups

This study investigated context-dependent intertemporal decision-making patterns in substance use disorder (SUD) through a comprehensive experimental paradigm examining both gain and loss contexts. Using mixed-effects analysis of 26,144 decisions from 186 participants (100 SUD, 86 controls), we found significant group differences in context-dependent choice patterns (OR = 0.39, p <.001). The SUD group showed enhanced preference for delayed losses (lnk = 4.67 vs. 4.81, p <.001) but only marginally stronger immediate reward preference (lnk = 4.40 vs. 4.37, p =.089). While temporal processing remained intact across groups (OR = 0.98, p =.785), magnitude sensitivity varied significantly by context, particularly in loss scenarios. These findings challenge traditional views of uniformly impaired decision-making in SUD and suggest the need for context-aware intervention strategies that leverage preserved temporal processing abilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-026-00729-2
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Context-dependent asymmetries in intertemporal decision-making: a comparative study of substance use disorder and control groups

Huoyin Zhang, Peng Lei, Hao Zhang, Shinian Ou et al.
Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Context-dependent asymmetries in intertemporal decision-making: a comparative study of substance use disorder and control groups

Huoyin Zhang, Peng Lei, Hao Zhang, Shinian Ou, Cunfeng Yuan
article en

Abstract

This study investigated context-dependent intertemporal decision-making patterns in substance use disorder (SUD) through a comprehensive experimental paradigm examining both gain and loss contexts. Using mixed-effects analysis of 26,144 decisions from 186 participants (100 SUD, 86 controls), we found significant group differences in context-dependent choice patterns (OR = 0.39, p <.001). The SUD group showed enhanced preference for delayed losses (lnk = 4.67 vs. 4.81, p <.001) but only marginally stronger immediate reward preference (lnk = 4.40 vs. 4.37, p =.089). While temporal processing remained intact across groups (OR = 0.98, p =.785), magnitude sensitivity varied significantly by context, particularly in loss scenarios. These findings challenge traditional views of uniformly impaired decision-making in SUD and suggest the need for context-aware intervention strategies that leverage preserved temporal processing abilities.

Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy
Army Medical University (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), Sichuan Tourism University (CN), Chengdu Normal University (CN), Civil Aviation Flight University of China (CN)
Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.