Ecosystem recovery in restored saltmarshes detected through invertebrate communities

Abstract Introduction Saltmarsh ecosystems support rich biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. Invertebrate communities underpin essential processes such as nutrient cycling and decomposition. However, saltmarshes have been widely degraded by land use change. Restoration strategies including livestock exclusion and tidal reinstatement are increasingly applied, yet their ecological outcomes for invertebrate communities remain poorly assessed. Objective To evaluate ecosystem recovery in restored saltmarshes by assessing macroinvertebrate community across disturbed, restored, and reference sites using traditional sampling and environmental DNA (eDNA) which capture complementary components of biodiversity. Methods We compared macroinvertebrate assemblages detected by eDNA metabarcoding and traditional techniques (bush beating, sweep nets, and soil cores) across disturbed, restored, and reference sites. Results eDNA detected fewer families than traditional sampling (146) but provided finer taxonomic resolution and captured compositional differences between disturbed and restored sites that traditional surveys did not detect. Species accumulation curves revealed differences in detection efficiency among sampling methods. Reference sites were dominated by taxa typical of oxygenated sediments, while restored sites supported taxa tolerant to fluctuating environmental conditions, indicative of early recovery. Livestock exclusion sites showed little differentiation from disturbed areas. Community change increased with restoration age; presence–absence data indicated convergence toward reference communities, and relative‐abundance data suggested ongoing reorganization of dominance, highlighting method‐dependent interpretations of recovery. Conclusion eDNA and traditional sampling capture complementary components of saltmarsh macroinvertebrate diversity and together provide a comprehensive understanding of restoration trajectories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70401
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecosystem recovery in restored saltmarshes detected through invertebrate communities

Agustina Quadri-Adrogué, Stacey M. Trevathan‐Tackett, Melissa Wartman, Kristian Bell
Restoration Ecology
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Ecosystem recovery in restored saltmarshes detected through invertebrate communities

Agustina Quadri-Adrogué, Stacey M. Trevathan‐Tackett, Melissa Wartman, Kristian Bell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Saltmarsh ecosystems support rich biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. Invertebrate communities underpin essential processes such as nutrient cycling and decomposition. However, saltmarshes have been widely degraded by land use change. Restoration strategies including livestock exclusion and tidal reinstatement are increasingly applied, yet their ecological outcomes for invertebrate communities remain poorly assessed. Objective To evaluate ecosystem recovery in restored saltmarshes by assessing macroinvertebrate community across disturbed, restored, and reference sites using traditional sampling and environmental DNA (eDNA) which capture complementary components of biodiversity. Methods We compared macroinvertebrate assemblages detected by eDNA metabarcoding and traditional techniques (bush beating, sweep nets, and soil cores) across disturbed, restored, and reference sites. Results eDNA detected fewer families than traditional sampling (146) but provided finer taxonomic resolution and captured compositional differences between disturbed and restored sites that traditional surveys did not detect. Species accumulation curves revealed differences in detection efficiency among sampling methods. Reference sites were dominated by taxa typical of oxygenated sediments, while restored sites supported taxa tolerant to fluctuating environmental conditions, indicative of early recovery. Livestock exclusion sites showed little differentiation from disturbed areas. Community change increased with restoration age; presence–absence data indicated convergence toward reference communities, and relative‐abundance data suggested ongoing reorganization of dominance, highlighting method‐dependent interpretations of recovery. Conclusion eDNA and traditional sampling capture complementary components of saltmarsh macroinvertebrate diversity and together provide a comprehensive understanding of restoration trajectories.

Restoration Ecology
Deakin University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.