Low-carbon supply chain management: manufacturer capital constraints and bankruptcy risk

Purpose This paper builds a decision-making model for supply chains under manufacturer capital constraint and bankruptcy risk, to investigate the supply chain members' optimal decisions under different carbon asset financing schemes, providing insights for capital-constrained enterprises. Design/methodology/approach A supplier-dominated Stackelberg game model, based on the newsvendor framework, is developed to analyze different carbon asset financing schemes and optimal decisions of supply chain participants. Furthermore, numerical simulations using real data from the cement industry are conducted in MATLAB R2024a to validate the analytical findings of the model. Findings The bankruptcy risk is not always detrimental to the capital-constrained manufacturer in the supply chain. An aggressive product quantity strategy with limited bankruptcy responsibility may enable the manufacturer to obtain higher profits. Higher financing costs do not necessarily mean increased bankruptcy risk, as it depends on the manufacturer's initial capital. Pledge financing always provides steady revenue growth for the capital-constrained manufacturer, while sell-buyback financing offers the potential for maximizing revenue with associated risks. The impact of carbon price volatility on the manufacturer varies across different financing schemes. An increase in carbon price will reduce the bankruptcy risk under pledge financing, but can contribute to lower profits under sell-buyback financing. Originality/value The contributions of this paper are as follows: Firstly, this paper addresses the capital constraints faced by the manufacturer in the low-carbon supply chain context by introducing carbon asset financing. Secondly, we conduct a comparative analysis of different carbon asset financing schemes, examining the relationship of optimal decisions and profits. Finally, carbon price volatility, market demand uncertainty and bankruptcy risk are incorporated into our model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Decision
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2025-1478
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-carbon supply chain management: manufacturer capital constraints and bankruptcy risk

Shengzhong Huang, Xiaomin Xu, Wensheng Wang
Management Decision
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Low-carbon supply chain management: manufacturer capital constraints and bankruptcy risk

Shengzhong Huang, Xiaomin Xu, Wensheng Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper builds a decision-making model for supply chains under manufacturer capital constraint and bankruptcy risk, to investigate the supply chain members' optimal decisions under different carbon asset financing schemes, providing insights for capital-constrained enterprises. Design/methodology/approach A supplier-dominated Stackelberg game model, based on the newsvendor framework, is developed to analyze different carbon asset financing schemes and optimal decisions of supply chain participants. Furthermore, numerical simulations using real data from the cement industry are conducted in MATLAB R2024a to validate the analytical findings of the model. Findings The bankruptcy risk is not always detrimental to the capital-constrained manufacturer in the supply chain. An aggressive product quantity strategy with limited bankruptcy responsibility may enable the manufacturer to obtain higher profits. Higher financing costs do not necessarily mean increased bankruptcy risk, as it depends on the manufacturer's initial capital. Pledge financing always provides steady revenue growth for the capital-constrained manufacturer, while sell-buyback financing offers the potential for maximizing revenue with associated risks. The impact of carbon price volatility on the manufacturer varies across different financing schemes. An increase in carbon price will reduce the bankruptcy risk under pledge financing, but can contribute to lower profits under sell-buyback financing. Originality/value The contributions of this paper are as follows: Firstly, this paper addresses the capital constraints faced by the manufacturer in the low-carbon supply chain context by introducing carbon asset financing. Secondly, we conduct a comparative analysis of different carbon asset financing schemes, examining the relationship of optimal decisions and profits. Finally, carbon price volatility, market demand uncertainty and bankruptcy risk are incorporated into our model.

Management Decision
China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.