Temporomandibular disorders: A century-old history of the battle between controversy and denialism

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) have been the subject to controversy for over a century, with early theories focusing on anatomical structures and their relationships. OBJECTIVE: The paper aims to examine the historical evolution of TMD concepts and the transition from mechanistic to biopsychosocial models, exploring the impact on diagnosis and therapy. RESULTS: Studies have either disproven or failed to support the early mechanistic models, thus leading to the establishment of the current evidence-based approach. The advent of postgraduate programs in orofacial pain and clinical practice guidelines has contributed to the standardization of TMD training on a global scale. DISCUSSION: Despite the compelling evidence supporting the modern model, some practitioners continue to resist these changes. The authors argue that this resistance can be construed as a denial of the well-established scientific findings that have emerged in this field. CONCLUSION: TMD diagnosis and management undergone significant advancements; however, ongoing research is imperative. The authors advocate for the broader acceptance of the evidence-based biopsychosocial model to ensure ongoing progress in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CRANIO®
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2026.2658680
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporomandibular disorders: A century-old history of the battle between controversy and denialism

Charles S. Greene, Jens C. Türp
CRANIO®
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Temporomandibular disorders: A century-old history of the battle between controversy and denialism

Charles S. Greene, Jens C. Türp
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) have been the subject to controversy for over a century, with early theories focusing on anatomical structures and their relationships. OBJECTIVE: The paper aims to examine the historical evolution of TMD concepts and the transition from mechanistic to biopsychosocial models, exploring the impact on diagnosis and therapy. RESULTS: Studies have either disproven or failed to support the early mechanistic models, thus leading to the establishment of the current evidence-based approach. The advent of postgraduate programs in orofacial pain and clinical practice guidelines has contributed to the standardization of TMD training on a global scale. DISCUSSION: Despite the compelling evidence supporting the modern model, some practitioners continue to resist these changes. The authors argue that this resistance can be construed as a denial of the well-established scientific findings that have emerged in this field. CONCLUSION: TMD diagnosis and management undergone significant advancements; however, ongoing research is imperative. The authors advocate for the broader acceptance of the evidence-based biopsychosocial model to ensure ongoing progress in the field.

CRANIO®
University of Illinois Chicago (US), Universitäres Zentrum für Zahnmedizin Basel (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.