Exploring contemporary views on Green Care Farms from a Canadian perspective

Green Care Farms (GCFs) are an emerging model of dementia care that integrate agricultural and outdoor activities into care environments and have demonstrated benefits for quality of life internationally. Despite growing interest, GCFs have not been implemented within Canadian long-term care (LTC) settings. This study aimed to explore interest holder perceptions regarding the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of implementing GCFs as a residential dementia care model in Canada. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten interest holders in Ontario and Saskatchewan, including LTC administrators, executives, policymakers, and family care partners. Interviews were conducted in person, by telephone, or via videoconferencing, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, following an iterative process of coding, theme development, and review to identify patterns of meaning across participant accounts. Four overarching themes were identified: social and engaging care, safety concerns, barriers to implementation, and infrastructure considerations. Participants viewed GCFs as having strong potential to enhance quality of life for people living with dementia through meaningful activity, social connection, and person-centred approaches, including reframing long-term care as a place to live rather than solely a place to die. However, significant concerns were raised regarding resident safety, risk management, and infection control, particularly in relation to outdoor environments and animals. Perceived barriers included restrictive funding models, legislative and policy constraints, and regulatory requirements that limit innovation within LTC. Discussion of infrastructure considerations highlighted the need for creative architectural design, appropriate staffing models, and additional resources to support land and animal care alongside clinical services. Interest holders viewed GCFs as a promising and innovative approach to residential dementia care in Canada, but identified substantial system-level, regulatory, and funding barriers to implementation. Addressing these challenges will require policy reform, flexible funding mechanisms, and further research examining feasibility, safety, and outcomes within the Canadian LTC context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07512-9
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring contemporary views on Green Care Farms from a Canadian perspective

Rebekah Churchyard, Habib Chaudhury, Marie‐Lee Yous, Jennifer M. Harris et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Rural development and sustainability
article

Exploring contemporary views on Green Care Farms from a Canadian perspective

Rebekah Churchyard, Habib Chaudhury, Marie‐Lee Yous, Jennifer M. Harris, Vanina Dal Bello‐Haas, Anthea Innes, Megan Campbell, GEN A SMITH, Tianci Dong, Sharon Kaasalainen, Abigail Wickson-Griffiths, Paulette V. Hunter, Talitha Ling
article en

Abstract

Green Care Farms (GCFs) are an emerging model of dementia care that integrate agricultural and outdoor activities into care environments and have demonstrated benefits for quality of life internationally. Despite growing interest, GCFs have not been implemented within Canadian long-term care (LTC) settings. This study aimed to explore interest holder perceptions regarding the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of implementing GCFs as a residential dementia care model in Canada. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten interest holders in Ontario and Saskatchewan, including LTC administrators, executives, policymakers, and family care partners. Interviews were conducted in person, by telephone, or via videoconferencing, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, following an iterative process of coding, theme development, and review to identify patterns of meaning across participant accounts. Four overarching themes were identified: social and engaging care, safety concerns, barriers to implementation, and infrastructure considerations. Participants viewed GCFs as having strong potential to enhance quality of life for people living with dementia through meaningful activity, social connection, and person-centred approaches, including reframing long-term care as a place to live rather than solely a place to die. However, significant concerns were raised regarding resident safety, risk management, and infection control, particularly in relation to outdoor environments and animals. Perceived barriers included restrictive funding models, legislative and policy constraints, and regulatory requirements that limit innovation within LTC. Discussion of infrastructure considerations highlighted the need for creative architectural design, appropriate staffing models, and additional resources to support land and animal care alongside clinical services. Interest holders viewed GCFs as a promising and innovative approach to residential dementia care in Canada, but identified substantial system-level, regulatory, and funding barriers to implementation. Addressing these challenges will require policy reform, flexible funding mechanisms, and further research examining feasibility, safety, and outcomes within the Canadian LTC context.

BMC Geriatrics
Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Regina (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), CARE Canada (CA), University of the Highlands and Islands (GB), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.