Spanish Investigative Journalism in the Face of Verification and Information Disorders

This research focuses on the perception that Spanish investigative journalists have of disinformation, exploring its impact on their professional routines. It also assesses the methods deployed by these professionals to mitigate its spread. To this end, a quantitative methodology based on the survey technique was used, and a structured interview comprising 18 questions was designed. This interview combined 7 closed questions with a five-point Likert-type scale structure and 11 open-ended questions to ascertain the perceptions of respondents more accurately. The survey involved 28 journalists from the Association of Investigative Journalists (API, its Spanish acronym) and various relevant media outlets. The results underline the rigor and independence required in investigative journalism to combat disinformation while drawing attention to the need to train and adapt the practice of journalism through new formats. The tension between the potential of technology and uneasiness about its reliability—an ambivalence that is on the rise with the emergence of AI—is also emphasized alongside the importance of ethics and transparency to restore the credibility of the media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism and Media
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7020084
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spanish Investigative Journalism in the Face of Verification and Information Disorders

Fernando Bonete Vizcaíno, Roberto Gelado Marcos, María Alcalá-Santaella Oria de Rueda
Journalism and Media
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Spanish Investigative Journalism in the Face of Verification and Information Disorders

Fernando Bonete Vizcaíno, Roberto Gelado Marcos, María Alcalá-Santaella Oria de Rueda
article en

Abstract

This research focuses on the perception that Spanish investigative journalists have of disinformation, exploring its impact on their professional routines. It also assesses the methods deployed by these professionals to mitigate its spread. To this end, a quantitative methodology based on the survey technique was used, and a structured interview comprising 18 questions was designed. This interview combined 7 closed questions with a five-point Likert-type scale structure and 11 open-ended questions to ascertain the perceptions of respondents more accurately. The survey involved 28 journalists from the Association of Investigative Journalists (API, its Spanish acronym) and various relevant media outlets. The results underline the rigor and independence required in investigative journalism to combat disinformation while drawing attention to the need to train and adapt the practice of journalism through new formats. The tension between the potential of technology and uneasiness about its reliability—an ambivalence that is on the rise with the emergence of AI—is also emphasized alongside the importance of ethics and transparency to restore the credibility of the media.

Journalism and MediaVol. 7(2)
Universidad San Pablo CEU (ES), Universidad Nebrija (ES)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spanish Investigative Journalism in the Face of Verification and Information Disorders — Fernando Bonete Vizcaíno, Roberto Gelado Marcos, et al. · Journalism and Media (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS