The Logic of Ornament: A Classical Taxonomy of Arabic and Persian Rhetorical Figures

This paper examines what appears to be the earliest systematic attempt to classify figurative devices in Persian, found in the logical work Kitāb Asās al-Iqtibās by the celebrated polymath Naṣīr ad-Dīn Ṭūsī (1201-1274). In doing so, it builds upon the earlier systematisation proposed by Ibn Sīnā (980-1037) in his commentary on the Poetics of Aristotle. I present Ṭūsī's classification in the form of a detailed diagram that visually renders his systematic approach to the artifices and embellishments of speech. The diagram highlights their ambitious effort to bring rhetorical analysis into conversation with philosophical principles. I conclude by considerations of how this diagram might be revised or expanded, both to test the limits of Ibn Sīnā-Ṭūsī system and to assess its potential adaptability for broader applications in contemporary rhetorical studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/qzq5g-5y733
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Logic of Ornament: A Classical Taxonomy of Arabic and Persian Rhetorical Figures

Kayvan Tahmasebian
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Islamic Studies and History
article

The Logic of Ornament: A Classical Taxonomy of Arabic and Persian Rhetorical Figures

Kayvan Tahmasebian
article en

Abstract

This paper examines what appears to be the earliest systematic attempt to classify figurative devices in Persian, found in the logical work Kitāb Asās al-Iqtibās by the celebrated polymath Naṣīr ad-Dīn Ṭūsī (1201-1274). In doing so, it builds upon the earlier systematisation proposed by Ibn Sīnā (980-1037) in his commentary on the Poetics of Aristotle. I present Ṭūsī's classification in the form of a detailed diagram that visually renders his systematic approach to the artifices and embellishments of speech. The diagram highlights their ambitious effort to bring rhetorical analysis into conversation with philosophical principles. I conclude by considerations of how this diagram might be revised or expanded, both to test the limits of Ibn Sīnā-Ṭūsī system and to assess its potential adaptability for broader applications in contemporary rhetorical studies.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
University of London (GB), SOAS University of London (GB), Universidad de Londres (MX)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.