On the Interdependence Between Podcast Design and Usage Motives in German-Language Podcasts

Systematic frameworks for describing podcast design remain scarce. Previous research on listening motives often treats podcasts as a monolithic category or focuses on specific genres, leaving open how motives vary across different design types. This dual-perspective investigation examines two questions: Which primary design types characterize German-language podcasts, and how are listening motives related to these design types? Using a multi-method qualitative approach, 30 podcasts were analyzed through iterative listening and 16 expert interviews to develop a typology of design. Additionally, 29 semi-structured listener interviews were examined via qualitative content analysis to identify usage motives and their associations with design types. The analysis identified three podcast design types—story, talk, and factual (STF)—each characterized by distinct structural and aesthetic features. The analysis further suggested that factual design types were primarily associated with cognitive motives, talk design types with social motives, and story design types with affective motives. The resulting STF model is a relevant framework for both academic research and practical applications in podcast production. The results further suggest that usage motives may be linked to these design types and thus indicates how podcast form and audience needs and gratifications may be interdependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism and Media
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7020086
Primary Topic
Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Interdependence Between Podcast Design and Usage Motives in German-Language Podcasts

Hans Knobloch, Lilian Suter, Pascal Streule, Nico Lypitkas et al.
Journalism and Media
Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
article

On the Interdependence Between Podcast Design and Usage Motives in German-Language Podcasts

Hans Knobloch, Lilian Suter, Pascal Streule, Nico Lypitkas, Caroline Feder, Svenja Deda-Bröchin, Gregor Waller
article en

Abstract

Systematic frameworks for describing podcast design remain scarce. Previous research on listening motives often treats podcasts as a monolithic category or focuses on specific genres, leaving open how motives vary across different design types. This dual-perspective investigation examines two questions: Which primary design types characterize German-language podcasts, and how are listening motives related to these design types? Using a multi-method qualitative approach, 30 podcasts were analyzed through iterative listening and 16 expert interviews to develop a typology of design. Additionally, 29 semi-structured listener interviews were examined via qualitative content analysis to identify usage motives and their associations with design types. The analysis identified three podcast design types—story, talk, and factual (STF)—each characterized by distinct structural and aesthetic features. The analysis further suggested that factual design types were primarily associated with cognitive motives, talk design types with social motives, and story design types with affective motives. The resulting STF model is a relevant framework for both academic research and practical applications in podcast production. The results further suggest that usage motives may be linked to these design types and thus indicates how podcast form and audience needs and gratifications may be interdependent.

Journalism and MediaVol. 7(2)
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), Zurich University of the Arts (CH)
Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.