Ten common mistakes that could ruin your enrichment analysis

Functional enrichment analysis (FEA) is an incredibly powerful way to summarise complex genomics data into information about the regulation of biological pathways including cellular metabolism, signalling and immune responses. About 10,000 scientific articles describe using FEA each year, making it among the most used techniques in bioinformatics. While FEA has become a routine part of workflows via myriad software packages and easy-to-use websites, mistakes can easily creep in due to poor tool design and unawareness among users of pitfalls. Here we outline ten mistakes that undermine the effectiveness of FEA which we commonly see in research articles. We provide practical advice on their mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014122
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten common mistakes that could ruin your enrichment analysis

Mark Ziemann, Anusuiya Bora, Matthew McKenzie
PLoS Computational Biology
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
article

Ten common mistakes that could ruin your enrichment analysis

Mark Ziemann, Anusuiya Bora, Matthew McKenzie
article en

Abstract

Functional enrichment analysis (FEA) is an incredibly powerful way to summarise complex genomics data into information about the regulation of biological pathways including cellular metabolism, signalling and immune responses. About 10,000 scientific articles describe using FEA each year, making it among the most used techniques in bioinformatics. While FEA has become a routine part of workflows via myriad software packages and easy-to-use websites, mistakes can easily creep in due to poor tool design and unawareness among users of pitfalls. Here we outline ten mistakes that undermine the effectiveness of FEA which we commonly see in research articles. We provide practical advice on their mitigation.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 22(4)
Burnet Institute (AU), Deakin University (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ten common mistakes that could ruin your enrichment analysis — Mark Ziemann, Anusuiya Bora, et al. · PLoS Computational Biology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS