Can high-pressure processing be used to manufacture safe hams with reduced levels of preservatives?

• Buffered vinegar or sodium diacetate reduction in hams compromises their safety • HPP and chilled storage ensures safety of hams with reduced levels of preservative • HPP can assist processors develop foods that are both healthy and safe Growing consumer demand for products containing fewer or reduced levels of preservatives have led meat processors to look for strategies to improve food safety while minimizing the use of synthetic preservatives. This study evaluated the effect of high pressure processing (0, 400, 600 MPa for 3 mins) on safety of cooked ham formulated with different levels of buffered vinegar (BV, 1.1, 2.2% w/w), or sodium diacetate (SD, 0.65, 1.3% w/w), surface inoculated (6 log CFU/g) with Salmonella spp or Listeria monocytogenes cocktails, and stored at 4 or 7°C for up to 28 days. Regardless of formulation, storage at 4 or 7°C did not support growth of Salmonella spp. In contrast, L. monocytogenes counts in hams formulated without preservatives or lower preservative levels increased over the storage period, while the bacteriostatic effect of BV and SD was evident at 2.2 and 1.3%, respectively. 600 MPa resulted in reduction of both Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in all formulations to levels below detection limit and remained at that level during storage. 400 MPa resulted in a 0.7- to 1-log CFU/g reduction in L. monocytogenes counts and remained unchanged over 28 days storage at 4°C, while at 7°C, L. monocytogenes counts in formulations without preservative increased by ∼1.75-log CFU/g, while counts in formulations with preservatives showed a concentration dependent inhibition ( P > 0.05). These results suggest that HPP at 600 MPa along with controlled low temperature storage could be effectively used to enhance safety of cooked hams formulated with lower levels of preservatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Food Research
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2026.102050
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can high-pressure processing be used to manufacture safe hams with reduced levels of preservatives?

Laura Arvaj, Shai Barbut, S. Balamurugan, Chaoyue Wang
Applied Food Research
Microbial Inactivation Methods
article

Can high-pressure processing be used to manufacture safe hams with reduced levels of preservatives?

Laura Arvaj, Shai Barbut, S. Balamurugan, Chaoyue Wang
article en

Abstract

• Buffered vinegar or sodium diacetate reduction in hams compromises their safety • HPP and chilled storage ensures safety of hams with reduced levels of preservative • HPP can assist processors develop foods that are both healthy and safe Growing consumer demand for products containing fewer or reduced levels of preservatives have led meat processors to look for strategies to improve food safety while minimizing the use of synthetic preservatives. This study evaluated the effect of high pressure processing (0, 400, 600 MPa for 3 mins) on safety of cooked ham formulated with different levels of buffered vinegar (BV, 1.1, 2.2% w/w), or sodium diacetate (SD, 0.65, 1.3% w/w), surface inoculated (6 log CFU/g) with Salmonella spp or Listeria monocytogenes cocktails, and stored at 4 or 7°C for up to 28 days. Regardless of formulation, storage at 4 or 7°C did not support growth of Salmonella spp. In contrast, L. monocytogenes counts in hams formulated without preservatives or lower preservative levels increased over the storage period, while the bacteriostatic effect of BV and SD was evident at 2.2 and 1.3%, respectively. 600 MPa resulted in reduction of both Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in all formulations to levels below detection limit and remained at that level during storage. 400 MPa resulted in a 0.7- to 1-log CFU/g reduction in L. monocytogenes counts and remained unchanged over 28 days storage at 4°C, while at 7°C, L. monocytogenes counts in formulations without preservative increased by ∼1.75-log CFU/g, while counts in formulations with preservatives showed a concentration dependent inhibition ( P > 0.05). These results suggest that HPP at 600 MPa along with controlled low temperature storage could be effectively used to enhance safety of cooked hams formulated with lower levels of preservatives.

Applied Food ResearchVol. 6(1)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), Guelph Research and Development Centre, University of Guelph (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.