06 | WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS AS A BARRIER AND SOURCE OF MICROPLASTICS

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) play a dual role in the environmental fate of microplastics (MPs), acting both as an effective barrier and a significant source of MP emissions to environment1. This study reports evidence on MPs dynamics in WWTPs, focusing on treated effluents, sewage sludge, and combined sewer overflows (CSOs). Long-term monitoring data from a full-scale WWTP highlighted that conventional treatment processes can achieve high MP removal efficiencies under dry weather conditions. However, large MP loads are retained in sludge, confirming WWTPs as important sinks of microplastics and raising concerns about their subsequent release through sludge handling and reuse practices2. In tis context, the adoption of more advanced treatment technologies, such as membrane bioreactors (MBRs), also encouraged by the new European Directive 2024/3019, can further increase microplastic removal from treated effluents. However, this improvement comes with a trade-off, as a larger fraction of MPs is retained in sewage sludge. Conversely, extreme rainfall events leading to CSO activation substantially alter this mitigation role. CSO discharges were found to contain MP concentrations up to an order of magnitude higher than treated effluents, driven by stormwater runoff, sewer sediment resuspension, and the bypass of treatment units3. These findings demonstrate that, although WWTPs effectively reduce continuous MPs emissions from treated wastewater, episodic CSO events represent critical pollution pulses with potentially high ecological relevance, especially in regions increasingly affected by climate-change-driven extreme rainfall. Overall, WWTPs should be considered dynamic systems whose role as barriers or sources of microplastics strongly depends on hydraulic conditions, treatment configuration, and climate. Mitigation strategies should therefore integrate advanced treatment technologies, improved stormwater and sewer management, and long-term monitoring frameworks to adequately control microplastic emissions under both normal and extreme operating conditions.References 1. Kamani H, Ghayebzadeh M, Ganji F. Tracking and risk assessment of microplastics in a wastewater treatment plant. Water Environ J 2024;38:613-27. 2. Van Do M, Le TX, Vu ND. Distribution and occurrence of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants. Environ Technol Innov 2022;26:102286. 3. Zhou Y, Li Y, Yan Z, et al. Microplastics discharged from urban drainage system: prominent contribution of sewer overflow pollution. Water Res 2023;236:119976.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino della Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2026.15576
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

06 | WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS AS A BARRIER AND SOURCE OF MICROPLASTICS

Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale
Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino della Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

06 | WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS AS A BARRIER AND SOURCE OF MICROPLASTICS

Società Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale
article en

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) play a dual role in the environmental fate of microplastics (MPs), acting both as an effective barrier and a significant source of MP emissions to environment1. This study reports evidence on MPs dynamics in WWTPs, focusing on treated effluents, sewage sludge, and combined sewer overflows (CSOs). Long-term monitoring data from a full-scale WWTP highlighted that conventional treatment processes can achieve high MP removal efficiencies under dry weather conditions. However, large MP loads are retained in sludge, confirming WWTPs as important sinks of microplastics and raising concerns about their subsequent release through sludge handling and reuse practices2. In tis context, the adoption of more advanced treatment technologies, such as membrane bioreactors (MBRs), also encouraged by the new European Directive 2024/3019, can further increase microplastic removal from treated effluents. However, this improvement comes with a trade-off, as a larger fraction of MPs is retained in sewage sludge. Conversely, extreme rainfall events leading to CSO activation substantially alter this mitigation role. CSO discharges were found to contain MP concentrations up to an order of magnitude higher than treated effluents, driven by stormwater runoff, sewer sediment resuspension, and the bypass of treatment units3. These findings demonstrate that, although WWTPs effectively reduce continuous MPs emissions from treated wastewater, episodic CSO events represent critical pollution pulses with potentially high ecological relevance, especially in regions increasingly affected by climate-change-driven extreme rainfall. Overall, WWTPs should be considered dynamic systems whose role as barriers or sources of microplastics strongly depends on hydraulic conditions, treatment configuration, and climate. Mitigation strategies should therefore integrate advanced treatment technologies, improved stormwater and sewer management, and long-term monitoring frameworks to adequately control microplastic emissions under both normal and extreme operating conditions.References 1. Kamani H, Ghayebzadeh M, Ganji F. Tracking and risk assessment of microplastics in a wastewater treatment plant. Water Environ J 2024;38:613-27. 2. Van Do M, Le TX, Vu ND. Distribution and occurrence of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants. Environ Technol Innov 2022;26:102286. 3. Zhou Y, Li Y, Yan Z, et al. Microplastics discharged from urban drainage system: prominent contribution of sewer overflow pollution. Water Res 2023;236:119976.

Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino della Società Italiana di Biologia SperimentaleVol. 99(s2)
University of Palermo (AR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.