Impact of Maternal Body Mass Index (BMI) on the Performance of Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used to screen for common fetal trisomies. Fetal fraction (FF), essential for NIPT accuracy, can be influenced by maternal obesity. This study analyzes NIPT results by obesity status and suggests strategies to improve performance. METHOD: This observational retrospective study evaluated FF, gestational age, number of re-works and re-sampling, and frequency of non-meaningful and aberrant results in different BMI categories in 26,000 pregnancies that underwent NIPT from April 2023 to March 2024. RESULTS: BMI was significantly associated with higher re-working and re-sampling needs due to non-meaningful results. Low FF (< 4%) occurred in 4.5% of women with normal weight (NW) and in 19.5% of obese women (BMI > 30), with the highest prevalence of 35.5% in women with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40). The effectiveness of re-working was 56% in obese women (BMI > 30) compared to 79% in a normal weight category (NW). The overall observed positivity rate in obese women was 0.45%, significantly lower than that in NW (0.94%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that NIPT performs suboptimal in obese women due to too low FF. This should be addressed during pre-test counseling and strategies such as re-sampling instead of re-working, or postponing NIPT until after 12 weeks of gestation may be advisable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70161
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Maternal Body Mass Index (BMI) on the Performance of Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)

Sophie Ottema, Marike Polak, Marieke Joosten, Sander Galjaard et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Impact of Maternal Body Mass Index (BMI) on the Performance of Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)

Sophie Ottema, Marike Polak, Marieke Joosten, Sander Galjaard, Karin E. M. Diderich, Malgorzata I. Srebniak, Mark Drost, Sandra G. Heil, Diane Van Opstal, Kristína Valovičová, Glenn Huijbregts
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used to screen for common fetal trisomies. Fetal fraction (FF), essential for NIPT accuracy, can be influenced by maternal obesity. This study analyzes NIPT results by obesity status and suggests strategies to improve performance. METHOD: This observational retrospective study evaluated FF, gestational age, number of re-works and re-sampling, and frequency of non-meaningful and aberrant results in different BMI categories in 26,000 pregnancies that underwent NIPT from April 2023 to March 2024. RESULTS: BMI was significantly associated with higher re-working and re-sampling needs due to non-meaningful results. Low FF (< 4%) occurred in 4.5% of women with normal weight (NW) and in 19.5% of obese women (BMI > 30), with the highest prevalence of 35.5% in women with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40). The effectiveness of re-working was 56% in obese women (BMI > 30) compared to 79% in a normal weight category (NW). The overall observed positivity rate in obese women was 0.45%, significantly lower than that in NW (0.94%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that NIPT performs suboptimal in obese women due to too low FF. This should be addressed during pre-test counseling and strategies such as re-sampling instead of re-working, or postponing NIPT until after 12 weeks of gestation may be advisable.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Masaryk University (CZ), Erasmus MC (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Masarykova Univerzita
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.