A systematic review of social media use among rural US adolescents and associated health outcomes

Understanding social media use among rural adolescents is important because they are a geographically and socially isolated population which may impact how they use social media and affect the impacts of use. The goal of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the literature on rural US adolescent social media use. Specifically, what is known about their social media use, amount and type of use, and the associations between social media use and health outcomes. A systematic search was conducted on seven databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they sampled rural US populations, sampled adolescents (ages 10–19), and had at least one of the following as an outcome: how much adolescents use social media, how adolescents are using social media including content, and/or whether social media use was associated with a health outcome. A total of 34 articles matched the inclusion criteria and were included in analysis (N = 22,315). Results suggest that rural US adolescents use social media to the same extent as non-rural adolescents. Rural adolescents with marginalized identities rely on social media to form connections with those with shared identities outside of their geographic area. Social media also fostered an environment for harmful connections, as numerous studies reported cyberbullying. In respect to mental health, using social media was found to be an avenue for coping with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, increased time spent on social media did not reduce existing feelings of nervousness, anxiety, depression, or stress in the pandemic. Interventional studies indicated that social media was successfully used as a tool to disseminate health information and provide support to marginalized groups amongst the already hard-to-reach population of rural adolescents. This systematic review highlights the lack of research dedicated to social media use amongst rural US adolescents, despite high prevalence of use. More research on the specific popularity of platforms and content consumed is needed to understand the nuanced effects of social media and to further investigate social media usage as a potential intervention target for this geographically and socially isolated population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27462-6
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of social media use among rural US adolescents and associated health outcomes

Sarah E. Domoff, Samantha L. Hahn, Kelsey L. Rose, Meredith Kells et al.
BMC Public Health
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

A systematic review of social media use among rural US adolescents and associated health outcomes

Sarah E. Domoff, Samantha L. Hahn, Kelsey L. Rose, Meredith Kells, Natalie Aguilar, Sharon Rhodes, Jeffrey M. Hunger, L. Wallace, Allison Rakowski, Sarah DeLapp, Anna Coleman, Summer Brewer, Michelle Moufawad
article en

Abstract

Understanding social media use among rural adolescents is important because they are a geographically and socially isolated population which may impact how they use social media and affect the impacts of use. The goal of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the literature on rural US adolescent social media use. Specifically, what is known about their social media use, amount and type of use, and the associations between social media use and health outcomes. A systematic search was conducted on seven databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they sampled rural US populations, sampled adolescents (ages 10–19), and had at least one of the following as an outcome: how much adolescents use social media, how adolescents are using social media including content, and/or whether social media use was associated with a health outcome. A total of 34 articles matched the inclusion criteria and were included in analysis (N = 22,315). Results suggest that rural US adolescents use social media to the same extent as non-rural adolescents. Rural adolescents with marginalized identities rely on social media to form connections with those with shared identities outside of their geographic area. Social media also fostered an environment for harmful connections, as numerous studies reported cyberbullying. In respect to mental health, using social media was found to be an avenue for coping with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, increased time spent on social media did not reduce existing feelings of nervousness, anxiety, depression, or stress in the pandemic. Interventional studies indicated that social media was successfully used as a tool to disseminate health information and provide support to marginalized groups amongst the already hard-to-reach population of rural adolescents. This systematic review highlights the lack of research dedicated to social media use amongst rural US adolescents, despite high prevalence of use. More research on the specific popularity of platforms and content consumed is needed to understand the nuanced effects of social media and to further investigate social media usage as a potential intervention target for this geographically and socially isolated population.

BMC Public Health
University of Vermont (US), Central Michigan University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), University of Rochester (US), Miami University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.