A Broadcast Code Switching Framework: English-Swahili Alternation in Kenyan Local Radio and the Limits of Conversational Models

The dominant frameworks for analysing code switching — Gumperz's conversational functions model, Myers-Scotton's Markedness Model, and Auer's sequential approach — were each developed through the analysis of face-to-face interaction. When applied individually to broadcast code switching, they produce incomplete analyses because they depend on interactional conditions that radio speech does not satisfy: a singular, co-present interlocutor; real-time feedback; and a stable unmarked code shared between speaker and hearer. English-Swahili code switching in Kenyan local radio violates all three conditions at once, and analyses that extend conversational frameworks to the broadcast context without accounting for these violations risk misreading both the functions and the motivations of language alternation in that context. This paper proposes a Broadcast Code Switching Framework (BCSF) that draws the three conversational models together into a single analytical instrument calibrated to the conditions of radio broadcasting. The BCSF organises its analysis around three interacting dimensions — the audience-structural, the indexical, and the ideological — and argues that a complete account of English-Swahili alternation in Kenyan radio cannot be produced from any one of them alone. The paper concludes that broadcast code switching is a theoretically distinct phenomenon from conversational code switching, with implications for sociolinguistic theory and for language policy in multilingual broadcasting contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i10-1716281
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Broadcast Code Switching Framework: English-Swahili Alternation in Kenyan Local Radio and the Limits of Conversational Models

Monicah Onyancha
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

A Broadcast Code Switching Framework: English-Swahili Alternation in Kenyan Local Radio and the Limits of Conversational Models

Monicah Onyancha
article en

Abstract

The dominant frameworks for analysing code switching — Gumperz's conversational functions model, Myers-Scotton's Markedness Model, and Auer's sequential approach — were each developed through the analysis of face-to-face interaction. When applied individually to broadcast code switching, they produce incomplete analyses because they depend on interactional conditions that radio speech does not satisfy: a singular, co-present interlocutor; real-time feedback; and a stable unmarked code shared between speaker and hearer. English-Swahili code switching in Kenyan local radio violates all three conditions at once, and analyses that extend conversational frameworks to the broadcast context without accounting for these violations risk misreading both the functions and the motivations of language alternation in that context. This paper proposes a Broadcast Code Switching Framework (BCSF) that draws the three conversational models together into a single analytical instrument calibrated to the conditions of radio broadcasting. The BCSF organises its analysis around three interacting dimensions — the audience-structural, the indexical, and the ideological — and argues that a complete account of English-Swahili alternation in Kenyan radio cannot be produced from any one of them alone. The paper concludes that broadcast code switching is a theoretically distinct phenomenon from conversational code switching, with implications for sociolinguistic theory and for language policy in multilingual broadcasting contexts.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(10)
Laikipia University (KE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.