Condensation Nuclei and Recoherence Failure Why Systems Fail to Recover When Conditions Appear Favourable

AbstractSystems regularly fail to recover from disruption even when the perturbation has been removed and conditionsappear favourable for restoration. This paper proposes that recoherence failure is not a unitary phenomenonbut a probability chain with independently identifiable failure points. Drawing on the physics ofheterogeneous nucleation — where phase transitions require a condensation nucleus, not merely favourablethermodynamic conditions — we formalise the Recoherence Probability Chain:α = P(A) × P(D|A) × P(C|A,D) × η(Φ)where P(A) is the accessibility of a viable attractor (formalised via Arrhenius barrier theory), P(D|A) theprobability the system detects that attractor, P(C|A,D) the probability of successful coupling, and η(Φ) thesystem’s coherence velocity — its capacity to coherently deploy regulatory resources toward the transition.We deploy this chain across three empirical domains — cellular and molecular biology, agricultural soilsystems, and forest ecosystem recovery — demonstrating that each α component can fail independently,producing observationally identical outcomes (persistent decoherence) from structurally distinct causes.Counterfactual historical tests (Aral Sea desiccation, coral reef phase shifts) confirm the framework’sretrospective diagnostic power. The framework resolves a persistent confusion in resilience science: theconflation of ‘insufficient support’ with structural inability to recohere. It derives from and extends the ρ/Carchitecture established in SIP-CORE-01. The internal structure of the decohered state — distinguishingprotective, bifurcated, disordered, and terminal decoherence regimes — is developed in the companion paperSIP-EP-04.Keywords: recoherence failure, nucleation theory, multiple stable states, hysteresis, phase transition, ecologicalhomeostasis, coherence-decoherence-recoherence, Arrhenius barrier, reaction-diffusion, Allee effect

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19694137
Primary Topic
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Condensation Nuclei and Recoherence Failure Why Systems Fail to Recover When Conditions Appear Favourable

John Richard Smith, SHAI / HATI3
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
article

Condensation Nuclei and Recoherence Failure Why Systems Fail to Recover When Conditions Appear Favourable

John Richard Smith, SHAI / HATI3
article en

Abstract

AbstractSystems regularly fail to recover from disruption even when the perturbation has been removed and conditionsappear favourable for restoration. This paper proposes that recoherence failure is not a unitary phenomenonbut a probability chain with independently identifiable failure points. Drawing on the physics ofheterogeneous nucleation — where phase transitions require a condensation nucleus, not merely favourablethermodynamic conditions — we formalise the Recoherence Probability Chain:α = P(A) × P(D|A) × P(C|A,D) × η(Φ)where P(A) is the accessibility of a viable attractor (formalised via Arrhenius barrier theory), P(D|A) theprobability the system detects that attractor, P(C|A,D) the probability of successful coupling, and η(Φ) thesystem’s coherence velocity — its capacity to coherently deploy regulatory resources toward the transition.We deploy this chain across three empirical domains — cellular and molecular biology, agricultural soilsystems, and forest ecosystem recovery — demonstrating that each α component can fail independently,producing observationally identical outcomes (persistent decoherence) from structurally distinct causes.Counterfactual historical tests (Aral Sea desiccation, coral reef phase shifts) confirm the framework’sretrospective diagnostic power. The framework resolves a persistent confusion in resilience science: theconflation of ‘insufficient support’ with structural inability to recohere. It derives from and extends the ρ/Carchitecture established in SIP-CORE-01. The internal structure of the decohered state — distinguishingprotective, bifurcated, disordered, and terminal decoherence regimes — is developed in the companion paperSIP-EP-04.Keywords: recoherence failure, nucleation theory, multiple stable states, hysteresis, phase transition, ecologicalhomeostasis, coherence-decoherence-recoherence, Arrhenius barrier, reaction-diffusion, Allee effect

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Symbiom (Czechia) (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Condensation Nuclei and Recoherence Failure Why Systems Fail to Recover When Conditions Appear Favourable — John Richard Smith, SHAI / HATI3 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS