Building a Contextual READINESS Model for AI‐Triggered Crises: Global Lessons From Algorithmic Exploitation in China's Food‐Delivery Platforms

ABSTRACT READINESS represents a proactive mindset reflecting an organization's willingness and capability to prepare for crises and respond ethically. To understand how organizations become “ready” for complex crises, particularly those arising from public moral outrage over publicly exposed AI use, this article proposes the Contextual READINESS Model for AI‐triggered crises, concentrating on crises driven by ethical and governance failures rather than technical issues. The model extends READINESS to a non‐Western dimension and positions it as an intermediary construct that links context and crisis communication strategies through theoretical integration. It also incorporates ethical AI adaptation into the broader crisis management process. Drawing on a comparative case study of two Chinese food delivery companies accused of algorithmic exploitation, the study shows how sociocultural dynamics shape READINESS, with proactive versus lagging READINESS leading to distinct communication and learning patterns. It also illustrates how organizations internalize, operate, and communicate ethical AI principles during and after crises. Overall, the study underscores READINESS's pivotal role in shaping responses to AI‐related ethical crises and contributes both theoretically, by expanding crisis communication frameworks to include contextual and ethical dimensions of AI, and practically, by offering a non‐Western perspective on organizational resilience and moral accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70157
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a Contextual READINESS Model for AI‐Triggered Crises: Global Lessons From Algorithmic Exploitation in China's Food‐Delivery Platforms

Yijia Xiao, Yang Cheng, Qiaoge Xie, Junzhen Li
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Building a Contextual READINESS Model for AI‐Triggered Crises: Global Lessons From Algorithmic Exploitation in China's Food‐Delivery Platforms

Yijia Xiao, Yang Cheng, Qiaoge Xie, Junzhen Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT READINESS represents a proactive mindset reflecting an organization's willingness and capability to prepare for crises and respond ethically. To understand how organizations become “ready” for complex crises, particularly those arising from public moral outrage over publicly exposed AI use, this article proposes the Contextual READINESS Model for AI‐triggered crises, concentrating on crises driven by ethical and governance failures rather than technical issues. The model extends READINESS to a non‐Western dimension and positions it as an intermediary construct that links context and crisis communication strategies through theoretical integration. It also incorporates ethical AI adaptation into the broader crisis management process. Drawing on a comparative case study of two Chinese food delivery companies accused of algorithmic exploitation, the study shows how sociocultural dynamics shape READINESS, with proactive versus lagging READINESS leading to distinct communication and learning patterns. It also illustrates how organizations internalize, operate, and communicate ethical AI principles during and after crises. Overall, the study underscores READINESS's pivotal role in shaping responses to AI‐related ethical crises and contributes both theoretically, by expanding crisis communication frameworks to include contextual and ethical dimensions of AI, and practically, by offering a non‐Western perspective on organizational resilience and moral accountability.

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis ManagementVol. 34(2)
North Carolina State University (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Communication University of China (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.