Early Results from a Pressureless Middle Ear Diagnostic and Its Relation to the Types of Tympanometry Results

Background/Objectives: In addition to the clinical gold standard, tympanometry, several alternatives for middle ear diagnostics have evolved over the past decades. With the so-called pressureless acoustic impedance test, the Neuranix Medwave, another device, came into play. Methods: Using a retrospective, anonymous study design, descriptive data were reported, and the correlation between Medwave’s results and tympanometry types was evaluated. Also, the correlation between the patients’ age and the Medwave resulting parameters was evaluated. We were able to show changes in the measurement results over time in the case of paracentesis and tube insertion. Results: The analyzed data show that it is possible to differentiate between tympanometry result type A and type B using the Medwave resulting parameter resonance frequency (“fR”), but not when using peak admittance (“P”). Between all other types, it was not possible to differentiate using the Medwave resulting parameters, nor fR nor P. Due to the low statistical power, this may be due to a type II error. Regarding age, a correlation was found only for the tympanometry result type A. The case over time showed a clear difference in the affected ear between the time before and after the ear surgeries, as well as the contralateral healthy ear. Conclusions: While this study indicates the potential use of the PLAI technology, especially as a tool in situations where traditional tympanometry is not feasible, the results need to be interpreted with caution. Further validation with larger and more balanced groups of participants is necessary to confirm these initial findings and to more clearly define the clinical utility of this technology.