Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh vs No Mesh for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Surgery

Importance: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is one of the most common complications after permanent colostomy, yet there is ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness and indications of preventive measures. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of funnel-shaped mesh in preventing PSH over a 3-year follow-up period. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Chimney Trial was a randomized, single-blinded, multicenter study conducted at 4 university and central hospitals in Finland and 1 central hospital in Sweden. This study presents the 3-year follow-up results. Of 439 screened patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic abdominoperineal excision or Hartmann procedure for rectal adenocarcinoma, 143 were randomized (68 to the mesh group and 67 to the control group). At 3 years, 50 patients in the mesh group and 51 in the control group were available for analysis; computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained in 44 and 39 patients, respectively. These data were analyzed from September 2025 to December 2025. Intervention: Placement of a funnel-shaped parastomal mesh vs no mesh at the time of abdominoperineal excision or Hartmann procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures: CT-confirmed PSH at 3-year follow-up. Results: The Chimney Trial included a total of 101 patients (39 female [39%] and 63 male [61%]). At 3 years, CT-confirmed PSH was observed in 25 of 44 patients (57%) in the mesh group and 32 of 39 patients (82%) in the control group (difference, -25%; 95% CI, -42% to -5%; P = .001). Clinically diagnosed PSH occurred in 5 of 50 patients (10%) vs 20 of 51 patients (39%) in the control group (difference, -29%; 95% CI, -44% to -13%; P < .001). PSHs were significantly larger in the control group compared with the mesh group (median [IQR], 86.8 [53.0-136.5] mL for the mesh group vs 185.9 [118.0-411.2] mL for the control group; P = .003). No significant differences were observed in other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, funnel-shaped mesh significantly reduced PSH incidence without increasing complications over a 3-year follow-up period. These findings support the use of a funnel-shaped mesh as an effective and safe preventive strategy to reduce the risk of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Surgery
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.1036
Primary Topic
Stoma care and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh vs No Mesh for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Surgery

Tarja Pinta, Marko Nikki, Tero Rautio, Jyrki Kössi et al.
JAMA Surgery
Stoma care and complications
article

Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh vs No Mesh for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Surgery

Tarja Pinta, Marko Nikki, Tero Rautio, Jyrki Kössi, Maziar Nikberg, Pasi Ohtonen, Monika Carpelan‐Holmström, Kirsi Lehto, Heikki Wiik, Elisa Mäkäräinen, Jyri Järvinen
article en

Abstract

Importance: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is one of the most common complications after permanent colostomy, yet there is ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness and indications of preventive measures. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of funnel-shaped mesh in preventing PSH over a 3-year follow-up period. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Chimney Trial was a randomized, single-blinded, multicenter study conducted at 4 university and central hospitals in Finland and 1 central hospital in Sweden. This study presents the 3-year follow-up results. Of 439 screened patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic abdominoperineal excision or Hartmann procedure for rectal adenocarcinoma, 143 were randomized (68 to the mesh group and 67 to the control group). At 3 years, 50 patients in the mesh group and 51 in the control group were available for analysis; computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained in 44 and 39 patients, respectively. These data were analyzed from September 2025 to December 2025. Intervention: Placement of a funnel-shaped parastomal mesh vs no mesh at the time of abdominoperineal excision or Hartmann procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures: CT-confirmed PSH at 3-year follow-up. Results: The Chimney Trial included a total of 101 patients (39 female [39%] and 63 male [61%]). At 3 years, CT-confirmed PSH was observed in 25 of 44 patients (57%) in the mesh group and 32 of 39 patients (82%) in the control group (difference, -25%; 95% CI, -42% to -5%; P = .001). Clinically diagnosed PSH occurred in 5 of 50 patients (10%) vs 20 of 51 patients (39%) in the control group (difference, -29%; 95% CI, -44% to -13%; P < .001). PSHs were significantly larger in the control group compared with the mesh group (median [IQR], 86.8 [53.0-136.5] mL for the mesh group vs 185.9 [118.0-411.2] mL for the control group; P = .003). No significant differences were observed in other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, funnel-shaped mesh significantly reduced PSH incidence without increasing complications over a 3-year follow-up period. These findings support the use of a funnel-shaped mesh as an effective and safe preventive strategy to reduce the risk of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.

JAMA Surgery
Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (FI), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Västmanlands sjukhus Västerås (SE), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Päijät-Hämeen Keskussairaala (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Stoma care and complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.