A comparative analysis of ABET-accredited programs in Asia

This study presents the first pan-Asian comparative analysis of ABET-accredited programs across 24 countries, addressing a critical gap in the literature on international quality assurance. Analyzing data from the official ABET database (July 2025), we map the current landscape and historical trends of accreditation in the region. Findings reveal 805 active programs, with a strong concentration at the bachelor’s level (754 programs, 93.7%). Saudi Arabia leads with 252 programs and is the sole country with master’s-level accreditation. Five nations—Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Turkey, and the Philippines—host nearly 70% of all bachelor’s programs, indicating strategic regional concentration. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Vietnam are the only three countries with Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) accreditation at both associate and bachelor’s levels. Notably, only 18.3% of accredited bachelor’s programs hold international mutual recognition (Seoul Accord), underscoring a focus on domestic quality assurance over global mobility. Historical data shows significant attrition in some countries, highlighting sustainability challenges. Through the lens of quality assurance, competitiveness, and mobility, this study offers evidence-based insights for institutions, accreditors, and policymakers aiming to enhance program quality and international alignment in Asian higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01540-8
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of ABET-accredited programs in Asia

Ganesh Khekare, Prof. Sai Kiran Oruganti, Mohammed Mujahid Ulla Faiz
Discover Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

A comparative analysis of ABET-accredited programs in Asia

Ganesh Khekare, Prof. Sai Kiran Oruganti, Mohammed Mujahid Ulla Faiz
article en

Abstract

This study presents the first pan-Asian comparative analysis of ABET-accredited programs across 24 countries, addressing a critical gap in the literature on international quality assurance. Analyzing data from the official ABET database (July 2025), we map the current landscape and historical trends of accreditation in the region. Findings reveal 805 active programs, with a strong concentration at the bachelor’s level (754 programs, 93.7%). Saudi Arabia leads with 252 programs and is the sole country with master’s-level accreditation. Five nations—Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Turkey, and the Philippines—host nearly 70% of all bachelor’s programs, indicating strategic regional concentration. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Vietnam are the only three countries with Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) accreditation at both associate and bachelor’s levels. Notably, only 18.3% of accredited bachelor’s programs hold international mutual recognition (Seoul Accord), underscoring a focus on domestic quality assurance over global mobility. Historical data shows significant attrition in some countries, highlighting sustainability challenges. Through the lens of quality assurance, competitiveness, and mobility, this study offers evidence-based insights for institutions, accreditors, and policymakers aiming to enhance program quality and international alignment in Asian higher education.

Discover Education
Lincoln University College (MY), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.