A Comparative Analysis of LPBF Process Maps for S2 and S6 Grades Tool Steel

Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) represents a significant advancement in metal additive manufacturing, facilitating the near-net-shape fabrication of intricate, high-performance tool-steel components. This process is accomplished through a layer-by-layer selective melting technique and extremely rapid solidification (ranging from 10³ to 10⁶ K/s). The establishment of process maps — both empirical and predictive frameworks that correlate variables such as laser power, scan speed, and defect thresholds — is crucial for defining processing windows and optimising parameter selection. In tool steels, the influence of alloying elements is significant as they affect solidification behaviour, phase stability, and susceptibility to cracking. Carbide-forming additions can constrict the defect-free range, while stabilising elements can enhance toughness and dimensional accuracy. This study aims to develop a process map for S6 tool steel by varying laser scan speed and laser power. Small cubes are printed using various combinations of these parameters, followed by microstructural characterisation of the as-built material. This characterisation includes optical microscopy (OM) and porosity assessment. After establishing the process map for S6, the resulting microstructures are compared with those previously characterised for LPBF-processed S2 tool steel. This comparison provides valuable insight into the differences in the as-built microstructures of LPBF S2 and LPBF S6, particularly in relation to how the presence and relative amounts of alloying elements influence processability and microstructural development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Key engineering materials
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4028/p-94l5js
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of LPBF Process Maps for S2 and S6 Grades Tool Steel

Enrico Saggionetto, Anne Mertens, Jérôme Tchoufang Tchuindjang, Dedry Olivier et al.
Key engineering materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

A Comparative Analysis of LPBF Process Maps for S2 and S6 Grades Tool Steel

Enrico Saggionetto, Anne Mertens, Jérôme Tchoufang Tchuindjang, Dedry Olivier, Alessandra Segatto
article en

Abstract

Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) represents a significant advancement in metal additive manufacturing, facilitating the near-net-shape fabrication of intricate, high-performance tool-steel components. This process is accomplished through a layer-by-layer selective melting technique and extremely rapid solidification (ranging from 10³ to 10⁶ K/s). The establishment of process maps — both empirical and predictive frameworks that correlate variables such as laser power, scan speed, and defect thresholds — is crucial for defining processing windows and optimising parameter selection. In tool steels, the influence of alloying elements is significant as they affect solidification behaviour, phase stability, and susceptibility to cracking. Carbide-forming additions can constrict the defect-free range, while stabilising elements can enhance toughness and dimensional accuracy. This study aims to develop a process map for S6 tool steel by varying laser scan speed and laser power. Small cubes are printed using various combinations of these parameters, followed by microstructural characterisation of the as-built material. This characterisation includes optical microscopy (OM) and porosity assessment. After establishing the process map for S6, the resulting microstructures are compared with those previously characterised for LPBF-processed S2 tool steel. This comparison provides valuable insight into the differences in the as-built microstructures of LPBF S2 and LPBF S6, particularly in relation to how the presence and relative amounts of alloying elements influence processability and microstructural development.

Key engineering materialsVol. 1047
University of Liège (BE)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.