Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Direct Sustainable Lithium Extraction from Brine: Solvent Extraction, Adsorption, and Combined Nanofiltration/Membrane Distillation−Crystallization

The rapidly growing demand for lithium, driven by the expansion of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage systems, highlights the need for cost-effective and sustainable extraction technologies. This study presents a techno-economic analysis evaluating the feasibility of three direct lithium extraction (DLE) methods for producing lithium carbonate from brine: solvent extraction, adsorption, and a combined nanofiltration/membrane distillation−crystallization (NF/MD). Key economic indicators, capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), net present value (NPV), rate of return on investment (ROROI), and payback period (PBP), were assessed across 11 lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) price scenarios ranging from $10,000 to $50,000/ton over a 15-year project lifetime. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted to determine how variations in chemical and consumable costs affect the economic outcomes of each method. The estimated CAPEX values are 5.5 M$ for adsorption, 5.6 M$ for NF/MD, and 8.5 M$ for solvent extraction, while the corresponding OPEX values are 3.9 $/kg for Li2CO3, 7 $/kg, and 7.5 $/kg, respectively. The results show that adsorption, due to its lower CAPEX and OPEX, is the most economically viable and remains profitable even under relatively low lithium price scenarios. Specifically, at a high profitability threshold of 40% ROROI, adsorption remains viable across all market prices, whereas NF/MD and solvent extraction require minimum Li2CO3 prices of approximately $14,000 and $18,000 per ton, respectively. Furthermore, sensitivity results indicate that a 40% increase in consumable costs results in a significant 38% decrease in NPV for solvent extraction, while adsorption remains highly resilient with only a 5% reduction. In contrast, solvent extraction performs poorly because of its higher cost structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Sustainable Resource Management
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssusresmgt.5c00695
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Direct Sustainable Lithium Extraction from Brine: Solvent Extraction, Adsorption, and Combined Nanofiltration/Membrane Distillation−Crystallization

Sheida Nili, Ehsan Vahidi, Seyedmehdi Sharifian, Seyedkamal Mousavinezhad et al.
ACS Sustainable Resource Management
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Direct Sustainable Lithium Extraction from Brine: Solvent Extraction, Adsorption, and Combined Nanofiltration/Membrane Distillation−Crystallization

Sheida Nili, Ehsan Vahidi, Seyedmehdi Sharifian, Seyedkamal Mousavinezhad, Sima Nikfar
article en

Abstract

The rapidly growing demand for lithium, driven by the expansion of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage systems, highlights the need for cost-effective and sustainable extraction technologies. This study presents a techno-economic analysis evaluating the feasibility of three direct lithium extraction (DLE) methods for producing lithium carbonate from brine: solvent extraction, adsorption, and a combined nanofiltration/membrane distillation−crystallization (NF/MD). Key economic indicators, capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), net present value (NPV), rate of return on investment (ROROI), and payback period (PBP), were assessed across 11 lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) price scenarios ranging from $10,000 to $50,000/ton over a 15-year project lifetime. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted to determine how variations in chemical and consumable costs affect the economic outcomes of each method. The estimated CAPEX values are 5.5 M$ for adsorption, 5.6 M$ for NF/MD, and 8.5 M$ for solvent extraction, while the corresponding OPEX values are 3.9 $/kg for Li2CO3, 7 $/kg, and 7.5 $/kg, respectively. The results show that adsorption, due to its lower CAPEX and OPEX, is the most economically viable and remains profitable even under relatively low lithium price scenarios. Specifically, at a high profitability threshold of 40% ROROI, adsorption remains viable across all market prices, whereas NF/MD and solvent extraction require minimum Li2CO3 prices of approximately $14,000 and $18,000 per ton, respectively. Furthermore, sensitivity results indicate that a 40% increase in consumable costs results in a significant 38% decrease in NPV for solvent extraction, while adsorption remains highly resilient with only a 5% reduction. In contrast, solvent extraction performs poorly because of its higher cost structure.

ACS Sustainable Resource Management
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.