Nobody Knows Better: Examining the Link Between Overconfidence and Conspiracy Beliefs

ABSTRACT This research explored the relationship between overconfidence and conspiracy beliefs. In Study 1, cross‐sectional analyses demonstrated that both overconfidence in general knowledge and in climate change knowledge were positively associated with climate change conspiracy beliefs. In Study 2, we extended this approach to the COVID‐19 domain, assessing overconfidence in COVID‐19 knowledge and related conspiracy beliefs. An experimental manipulation of overconfidence did not provide evidence for a causal effect on conspiracy beliefs. Study 3 evaluated the reverse pathway by exposing participants to a conspiracy theory about the death of Jeffrey Epstein; this manipulation was not associated with increases in overconfidence. The exploratory post hoc moderation analyses, however, suggested that overconfidence may amplify the association between conspiracy exposure and conspiracy beliefs. Collectively, these findings are consistent with the interpretation that overconfidence is not directly responsible for the formation of conspiracy beliefs but may be linked to greater susceptibility to conspiratorial information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70202
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nobody Knows Better: Examining the Link Between Overconfidence and Conspiracy Beliefs

Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Haiyan Wang
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Nobody Knows Better: Examining the Link Between Overconfidence and Conspiracy Beliefs

Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Haiyan Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research explored the relationship between overconfidence and conspiracy beliefs. In Study 1, cross‐sectional analyses demonstrated that both overconfidence in general knowledge and in climate change knowledge were positively associated with climate change conspiracy beliefs. In Study 2, we extended this approach to the COVID‐19 domain, assessing overconfidence in COVID‐19 knowledge and related conspiracy beliefs. An experimental manipulation of overconfidence did not provide evidence for a causal effect on conspiracy beliefs. Study 3 evaluated the reverse pathway by exposing participants to a conspiracy theory about the death of Jeffrey Epstein; this manipulation was not associated with increases in overconfidence. The exploratory post hoc moderation analyses, however, suggested that overconfidence may amplify the association between conspiracy exposure and conspiracy beliefs. Collectively, these findings are consistent with the interpretation that overconfidence is not directly responsible for the formation of conspiracy beliefs but may be linked to greater susceptibility to conspiratorial information.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(3)
Maastricht University (NL), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.