Examining the Evidence on Social Media Marketing and Purchase Intention: A Critique of Hakro et al. (2023)

This paper presents a structured critical evaluation of Hakro et al. (2023), examining whether the empirical evidence offered is sufficient to support claims that social media marketing significantly influences consumer purchase intention through consumer engagement. Using a documentary critique approach, the paper assesses internal consistency, methodological alignment, statistical interpretation, and the adequacy of mediation testing within the focal study, while situating the findings against contemporary marketing literature. The analysis concludes that the article provides exploratory, context-specific evidence rather than robust generalizable proof, highlighting weak effect sizes, inconsistencies in sample reporting, and unsupported mediation claims. As a result, the paper cautions both scholars and practitioners against treating the study as a stand-alone basis for broad strategic decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19687953
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Evidence on Social Media Marketing and Purchase Intention: A Critique of Hakro et al. (2023)

Raphael M Mupeta
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Examining the Evidence on Social Media Marketing and Purchase Intention: A Critique of Hakro et al. (2023)

Raphael M Mupeta
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a structured critical evaluation of Hakro et al. (2023), examining whether the empirical evidence offered is sufficient to support claims that social media marketing significantly influences consumer purchase intention through consumer engagement. Using a documentary critique approach, the paper assesses internal consistency, methodological alignment, statistical interpretation, and the adequacy of mediation testing within the focal study, while situating the findings against contemporary marketing literature. The analysis concludes that the article provides exploratory, context-specific evidence rather than robust generalizable proof, highlighting weak effect sizes, inconsistencies in sample reporting, and unsupported mediation claims. As a result, the paper cautions both scholars and practitioners against treating the study as a stand-alone basis for broad strategic decision-making.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Zambia (ZM)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.