Klopstock’s <i>Kürze</i> and Its Impact on Coleridge’s Aesthetic Thought

This study examines the 1798 conversation between Klopstock and Coleridge, focusing on the concepts of Kürze (brevity, vivacity) and German prefix-verbs, which shaped Klopstock’s poetic practice and theory. Although Coleridge initially misinterpreted Kürze as a quantitative concept pertaining to the number of syllables, words, or verses, its influence persisted in his later theories of imagination and the symbol in Biographia Literaria. Upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that Coleridge’s interpretation is more aligned with Klopstock’s views than initially thought. For Klopstock, Kürze holistically conditioned all aspects of poetic expression, thereby determining the cognitive and emotional effect of poetry as a whole. Both Kürze and the symbol challenge empiricist epistemology by redefining the relationship between poetry and cognition. Rather than tracing a direct genealogical link, this study contextualizes their ideas within the linguistic debates of their time, revealing a functional equivalence that connects Klopstock’s Kürze to Coleridge’s symbol. In doing so, the study offers new insights into Coleridge’s intellectual development and his pursuit of a distinct conceptual language for his emerging theory of imagination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Philology
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/740213
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Klopstock’s Kürze and Its Impact on Coleridge’s Aesthetic Thought

Jan Oliver Jost-Fritz
Modern Philology
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Klopstock’s Kürze and Its Impact on Coleridge’s Aesthetic Thought

Jan Oliver Jost-Fritz
article en

Abstract

This study examines the 1798 conversation between Klopstock and Coleridge, focusing on the concepts of Kürze (brevity, vivacity) and German prefix-verbs, which shaped Klopstock’s poetic practice and theory. Although Coleridge initially misinterpreted Kürze as a quantitative concept pertaining to the number of syllables, words, or verses, its influence persisted in his later theories of imagination and the symbol in Biographia Literaria. Upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that Coleridge’s interpretation is more aligned with Klopstock’s views than initially thought. For Klopstock, Kürze holistically conditioned all aspects of poetic expression, thereby determining the cognitive and emotional effect of poetry as a whole. Both Kürze and the symbol challenge empiricist epistemology by redefining the relationship between poetry and cognition. Rather than tracing a direct genealogical link, this study contextualizes their ideas within the linguistic debates of their time, revealing a functional equivalence that connects Klopstock’s Kürze to Coleridge’s symbol. In doing so, the study offers new insights into Coleridge’s intellectual development and his pursuit of a distinct conceptual language for his emerging theory of imagination.

Modern PhilologyVol. 123(4)
East Tennessee State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.