Comparative performance of high-throughput qPCR, qPCR, and digital PCR for antibiotic resistance gene monitoring in tropical water systems
, which was not observed by HT-qPCR or qPCR. Quantifications from qPCR and ddPCR showed high rank-based concordance across matrices. Combining HT-qPCR with qPCR improved coverage by about 1% relative to HT-qPCR alone, while HT-qPCR with ddPCR offered nearly identical values. In conclusion, HT-qPCR was most effective for comprehensive profiling, qPCR ensured reliable quantification, and ddPCR enabled detection of rare targets, supporting a tiered and cost-effective framework for smart ARG monitoring in tropical aquatic environments.
Authors
- Andrew C. Singer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-6063)
- Rojana Sukchawalit
- Kwanrawee Sirikanchana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-4060)
- Phongsawat Paisantham
- Thitima Srathongneam
- Skorn Mongkolsuk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9698-0004)
Institutions
- Chulabhorn Graduate Institute (TH)
- Chulabhorn Research Institute (TH)
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BioTechniques
- Published
- 2026-04-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2026.2649861
- Primary Topic
- Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Thailand Science Research and Innovation