Layered Seismic Anisotropy and Tectonics of the Anatolian Plate

Abstract Anatolian tectonics are associated with slab retreat in the west and gravitational potential energy and continental collision in the east, leading to westward motion of Anatolia relative to Eurasia, partially accommodated on the North and East Anatolian transform faults. We construct a three‐layer, azimuthal seismic anisotropy model using new Rayleigh wave measurements and compare results against geodetic strain‐rates and new receiver function analysis for the crust, as well as new and existing shear wave splitting for the mantle to link surface and deep dynamics. In the crust, anisotropy is primarily controlled by recent tectonics, especially along major fault zones. In the lithospheric mantle, anisotropy reflects ongoing tectonic deformation in western Anatolia, whereas eastern Anatolia mainly preserves prior deformation signatures. In the asthenosphere, anisotropy reflects mantle convection, including the effects of Hellenic slab retreat. Our model provides new constraints on lithospheric deformation and geodynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl120326
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Layered Seismic Anisotropy and Tectonics of the Anatolian Plate

Chuanming Liu, T. W. Becker, V. Schulte‐Pelkum, Frederik Link et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
High-pressure geophysics and materials
article

Layered Seismic Anisotropy and Tectonics of the Anatolian Plate

Chuanming Liu, T. W. Becker, V. Schulte‐Pelkum, Frederik Link, Lili Feng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Anatolian tectonics are associated with slab retreat in the west and gravitational potential energy and continental collision in the east, leading to westward motion of Anatolia relative to Eurasia, partially accommodated on the North and East Anatolian transform faults. We construct a three‐layer, azimuthal seismic anisotropy model using new Rayleigh wave measurements and compare results against geodetic strain‐rates and new receiver function analysis for the crust, as well as new and existing shear wave splitting for the mantle to link surface and deep dynamics. In the crust, anisotropy is primarily controlled by recent tectonics, especially along major fault zones. In the lithospheric mantle, anisotropy reflects ongoing tectonic deformation in western Anatolia, whereas eastern Anatolia mainly preserves prior deformation signatures. In the asthenosphere, anisotropy reflects mantle convection, including the effects of Hellenic slab retreat. Our model provides new constraints on lithospheric deformation and geodynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(8)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Yale University (US), Pollinator Partnership (US), University of Missouri (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Division of Earth Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.