Mental-state reasoning or downstream vascular burden? Theory of Mind task performance in post-stroke aphasia

Background: Theory of Mind (ToM) deficits are well-documented in right-hemisphere stroke but remain understudied in post-stroke aphasia. Prior work suggests that performance on tasks assessing ToM may be relatively preserved in aphasia and dissociable from language impairment, but these findings are based largely on small studies. This study examined performance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in post-stroke aphasia, its relationship with aphasia severity, and whether vascular brain health, operationalized using cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, contributed to variability in performance. Methods: Forty-four individuals with aphasia completed two nonverbal belief-reasoning tasks assessing spontaneous perspective-taking and self-perspective inhibition. Task accuracy served as the primary outcome. Linear regression models examined associations between task performance, aphasia severity (Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient), and CSVD markers, including white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, lacunes and enlarged perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia and centrum semiovale. Results: Performance was heterogeneous across tasks, with reduced performance observed in 23% of participants on the Reality-Unknown task and 36% on the Reality-Known task. Aphasia severity was not associated with task accuracy. Greater cerebral microbleed count was associated with lower accuracy on both tasks, while greater basal ganglia enlarged perivascular spaces burden showed a more selective association with lower performance. Conclusions: Performance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in aphasia is variable and not explained by aphasia severity alone. These findings suggest that apparent ToM-related difficulties in aphasia may be shaped by broader vascular brain health, supporting a more multidimensional framework for interpreting social-cognitive task performance after stroke.