A mode-of-Action-Based Approach for Predicting Cross-Species Sensitivity of Freshwater Invertebrates to Chemicals

Chemical pollution is a major and growing pressure on freshwater ecosystems, yet it is unfeasible to test the effects of every chemical on every species. As a result, environmental risk assessment depends heavily on extrapolating toxicity from a few model species and chemicals, often without mechanistic justification. Here, we investigate whether grouping chemicals by toxic mode of action, i.e., chemicals acting through the same biological mechanism, can support prediction of cross-species and cross-chemical variation in sensitivity. Specifically, we address three questions: (1) do species show more consistent rank-order sensitivity across chemicals that share the same toxic mode of action? (2) within each mode of action, can variation in potency be explained by differences in chemical hydrophobicity? and (3) can stable interspecific sensitivity patterns be used to predict toxicity for untested species and chemicals using a sensitivity-ratio read-across approach anchored on Daphnia magna? We generated an acute toxicity dataset for twelve chemicals representing four modes of action (demethylation inhibitors, quinone outside inhibitors, sodium-channel modulators, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists) and nine freshwater invertebrates spanning a diverse range of taxa tested under standardised laboratory conditions. Species sensitivity rankings were strongly conserved within modes of action but not between modes of action. Increasing chemical hydrophobicity was associated with higher toxicity for three modes of action, but this relationship was not consistent across all modes of action. The sensitivity-ratio method, anchored on Daphnia magna, successfully reproduced species sensitivity patterns and predicted EC50 values for untested species with median fold-errors of 1.7-2.3 across modes of action. Overall, the stable, trait-driven sensitivity patterns revealed within each mode of action offer a mechanistic foundation for more reliable read-across predictions and a pathway toward more efficient and ecologically meaningful chemical risk assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag061
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mode-of-Action-Based Approach for Predicting Cross-Species Sensitivity of Freshwater Invertebrates to Chemicals

Ieuan Roberts, Anthony Turner, Maltby, Rana Al-jaibachi et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

A mode-of-Action-Based Approach for Predicting Cross-Species Sensitivity of Freshwater Invertebrates to Chemicals

Ieuan Roberts, Anthony Turner, Maltby, Rana Al-jaibachi, Alistair B A Boxall, Amy Ockenden
article en

Abstract

Chemical pollution is a major and growing pressure on freshwater ecosystems, yet it is unfeasible to test the effects of every chemical on every species. As a result, environmental risk assessment depends heavily on extrapolating toxicity from a few model species and chemicals, often without mechanistic justification. Here, we investigate whether grouping chemicals by toxic mode of action, i.e., chemicals acting through the same biological mechanism, can support prediction of cross-species and cross-chemical variation in sensitivity. Specifically, we address three questions: (1) do species show more consistent rank-order sensitivity across chemicals that share the same toxic mode of action? (2) within each mode of action, can variation in potency be explained by differences in chemical hydrophobicity? and (3) can stable interspecific sensitivity patterns be used to predict toxicity for untested species and chemicals using a sensitivity-ratio read-across approach anchored on Daphnia magna? We generated an acute toxicity dataset for twelve chemicals representing four modes of action (demethylation inhibitors, quinone outside inhibitors, sodium-channel modulators, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists) and nine freshwater invertebrates spanning a diverse range of taxa tested under standardised laboratory conditions. Species sensitivity rankings were strongly conserved within modes of action but not between modes of action. Increasing chemical hydrophobicity was associated with higher toxicity for three modes of action, but this relationship was not consistent across all modes of action. The sensitivity-ratio method, anchored on Daphnia magna, successfully reproduced species sensitivity patterns and predicted EC50 values for untested species with median fold-errors of 1.7-2.3 across modes of action. Overall, the stable, trait-driven sensitivity patterns revealed within each mode of action offer a mechanistic foundation for more reliable read-across predictions and a pathway toward more efficient and ecologically meaningful chemical risk assessment.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
University of York (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.