EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE ACCURACY OF FIVE INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION FORMULAE IN CATARACTOUS EYES WITH SHORT AXIAL LENGTH

Abstract Purpose: To compare the predictive accuracy of five intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Binkhorst, and Barrett Universal II in cataract patients with short axial length (<22.00 mm). Methods: In this prospective observational study, 65 eyes with axial length <22.00 mm undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation were included. Preoperative biometry (axial length, keratometry, anterior chamber depth) was obtained using standard immersion ultrasound. IOL power was calculated using SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Binkhorst, and Barrett Universal II formulae. The actual postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was measured at 6 weeks. Absolute prediction errors (AE) were determined for each formula and compared statistically. Results: The mean age was 62.81 ± 5.17 years, with a female predominance. Significant postoperative visual improvement was observed. Hoffer Q showed the lowest mean AE (0.09± 0.09D), indicating the highest predictive accuracy, followed by Barrett Universal II (0.128 ± 0.164) and Holladay (0.227 ± 0.139). SRK/Theoretic and Binkhorst formulae demonstrated higher errors. Conclusion: Hoffer Q is the most accurate formula for IOL power calculation in short axial length eyes, with Barrett Universal II as a reliable alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19675740
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE ACCURACY OF FIVE INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION FORMULAE IN CATARACTOUS EYES WITH SHORT AXIAL LENGTH

Shivani Yadav, Navneet Pratap Singh, Abha Gahlot, ANJALI TYAGI et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE ACCURACY OF FIVE INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION FORMULAE IN CATARACTOUS EYES WITH SHORT AXIAL LENGTH

Shivani Yadav, Navneet Pratap Singh, Abha Gahlot, ANJALI TYAGI, BHUMIKA CHACHRA, ANKITA SINGH
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To compare the predictive accuracy of five intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Binkhorst, and Barrett Universal II in cataract patients with short axial length (<22.00 mm). Methods: In this prospective observational study, 65 eyes with axial length <22.00 mm undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation were included. Preoperative biometry (axial length, keratometry, anterior chamber depth) was obtained using standard immersion ultrasound. IOL power was calculated using SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Binkhorst, and Barrett Universal II formulae. The actual postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was measured at 6 weeks. Absolute prediction errors (AE) were determined for each formula and compared statistically. Results: The mean age was 62.81 ± 5.17 years, with a female predominance. Significant postoperative visual improvement was observed. Hoffer Q showed the lowest mean AE (0.09± 0.09D), indicating the highest predictive accuracy, followed by Barrett Universal II (0.128 ± 0.164) and Holladay (0.227 ± 0.139). SRK/Theoretic and Binkhorst formulae demonstrated higher errors. Conclusion: Hoffer Q is the most accurate formula for IOL power calculation in short axial length eyes, with Barrett Universal II as a reliable alternative.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sharda University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.