LLM‐Based Scientific Assistants for Knowledge Extraction: Which Design Choices Matter?

Large Language Model chatbots have gained significant popularity, offering knowledge to support specialists in diverse fields. However, adapting models to specific use cases and specialized domains presents considerable challenges. Hence, we introduce the LLM Playground, a comprehensive approach to optimizing LLMs for specialist applications with respect to their accuracy in answering domain‐specific questions, addressing the limitations of unmodified models. The utilized optimization techniques begin with Prompt Engineering, advance to the integration of external knowledge, and culminate in complex reasoning strategies or self‐feedback loops. This paper introduces various architectures for scientific assistants, comprising individual enhancement techniques, both in isolation and in combination with others, designed to facilitate comparisons. To demonstrate the efficacy of the LLM Playground, a chemical chatbot is set up as a case study, and the optimization techniques are compared using ChemBench, an independent question–answer benchmark for the chemical domain, to measure its performance. By providing tested, ready‐to‐deploy architectures and clear use‐case guidance, this work helps researchers and practitioners leverage LLMs in domain‐specific applications. The insights and methodologies presented in this paper contribute to the growing body of knowledge on tailoring LLMs to meet the unique demands of specialized fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aidi.202500197
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM‐Based Scientific Assistants for Knowledge Extraction: Which Design Choices Matter?

Christof M. Niemeyer, Markus Reischl, Manuel Raimann, Luca Rettenberger et al.
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
AI in Service Interactions
article

LLM‐Based Scientific Assistants for Knowledge Extraction: Which Design Choices Matter?

Christof M. Niemeyer, Markus Reischl, Manuel Raimann, Luca Rettenberger, Maxim Rosin, David Exler, Marc Münker, Joaquin E. Urrutia Gómez
article en

Abstract

Large Language Model chatbots have gained significant popularity, offering knowledge to support specialists in diverse fields. However, adapting models to specific use cases and specialized domains presents considerable challenges. Hence, we introduce the LLM Playground, a comprehensive approach to optimizing LLMs for specialist applications with respect to their accuracy in answering domain‐specific questions, addressing the limitations of unmodified models. The utilized optimization techniques begin with Prompt Engineering, advance to the integration of external knowledge, and culminate in complex reasoning strategies or self‐feedback loops. This paper introduces various architectures for scientific assistants, comprising individual enhancement techniques, both in isolation and in combination with others, designed to facilitate comparisons. To demonstrate the efficacy of the LLM Playground, a chemical chatbot is set up as a case study, and the optimization techniques are compared using ChemBench, an independent question–answer benchmark for the chemical domain, to measure its performance. By providing tested, ready‐to‐deploy architectures and clear use‐case guidance, this work helps researchers and practitioners leverage LLMs in domain‐specific applications. The insights and methodologies presented in this paper contribute to the growing body of knowledge on tailoring LLMs to meet the unique demands of specialized fields.

Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Kerntechnische Entsorgung Karlsruhe (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.