Current strength and conditioning in Southeast Asia: Practices, challenges, and emerging trends
Strength and conditioning (S&C) is a field within exercise science that advocates evidence-based practice. As empirical knowledge evolves, translation of this knowledge into coaching practice is expected. However, knowledge translation remains challenging across many industries, particularly S&C, due to varying professional standards and limited resources. This study investigated current practices, challenges, and trends among S&C coaches in Southeast Asia (SEA). Seventy-one S&C coaches (87% male) from major sports organisations completed an online survey covering demographics, job satisfaction, motivation, programming knowledge, AI use, training principles, and exercise methods. Frequency analysis and Chi-square tests assessed data distribution and group differences. Most coaches held a bachelor's degree (93%) and S&C certification(s) (73%). Approximately half (49%) were satisfied with their roles, with mixed views on salary (38% satisfied vs. 38% dissatisfied). Passion (89%) was the primary motivator, while limited facilities (72%) and financial incentives (61%) were common challenges. Coaches reported greater proficiency in strength (87%) than conditioning (57%) programming. AI use within programming (e.g., ChatGPT) was limited (8%). Exercise selection was guided by training goals (93%), experience (87%), specificity (85%), and periodisation (80%). Load intensity and progression were primarily prescribed using percent-based (80% and 85%, respectively) and RPE-based (80%, 72%), with lower use of velocity-based methods (48%, 34%). Application of conventional, eccentric-, concentric-, and isometric-emphasis training were widespread (≥85%), with 100% using supersets for strength and hypertrophy development. S&C coaches in SEA demonstrated foundational qualifications, programming skills, and awareness of evidence-based methods, while emphasising athlete-centred approaches and communication. Structured professional development, consideration of AI-based tools, and organisational support are recommended.
Authors
- Raja Mohammed Firhad Raja Azidin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4770-2870)
- Jad Adrian Washif (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8543-4489)
- Nur Ikhwan Mohamad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-8274)
- Julian Lim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-6803)
- C. Martyn Beaven (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-7460)
- Jeffrey Pagaduan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1435-7636)
- Danny Lum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8908-3791)
- Erik Tan
- Lian Yee Kok
- Carl James
Institutions
- Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
- Sultan Idris Education University (MY)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Netaji Subhas National Institute of Sports (IN)
- Institute of High Performance Computing (SG)
- University of Glasgow Singapore (SG)
- University of Waikato (NZ)
- Victoria University (AU)
- Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
- Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
- Published
- 2026-04-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261431976
- Primary Topic
- Sports Performance and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00