Current strength and conditioning in Southeast Asia: Practices, challenges, and emerging trends

Strength and conditioning (S&C) is a field within exercise science that advocates evidence-based practice. As empirical knowledge evolves, translation of this knowledge into coaching practice is expected. However, knowledge translation remains challenging across many industries, particularly S&C, due to varying professional standards and limited resources. This study investigated current practices, challenges, and trends among S&C coaches in Southeast Asia (SEA). Seventy-one S&C coaches (87% male) from major sports organisations completed an online survey covering demographics, job satisfaction, motivation, programming knowledge, AI use, training principles, and exercise methods. Frequency analysis and Chi-square tests assessed data distribution and group differences. Most coaches held a bachelor's degree (93%) and S&C certification(s) (73%). Approximately half (49%) were satisfied with their roles, with mixed views on salary (38% satisfied vs. 38% dissatisfied). Passion (89%) was the primary motivator, while limited facilities (72%) and financial incentives (61%) were common challenges. Coaches reported greater proficiency in strength (87%) than conditioning (57%) programming. AI use within programming (e.g., ChatGPT) was limited (8%). Exercise selection was guided by training goals (93%), experience (87%), specificity (85%), and periodisation (80%). Load intensity and progression were primarily prescribed using percent-based (80% and 85%, respectively) and RPE-based (80%, 72%), with lower use of velocity-based methods (48%, 34%). Application of conventional, eccentric-, concentric-, and isometric-emphasis training were widespread (≥85%), with 100% using supersets for strength and hypertrophy development. S&C coaches in SEA demonstrated foundational qualifications, programming skills, and awareness of evidence-based methods, while emphasising athlete-centred approaches and communication. Structured professional development, consideration of AI-based tools, and organisational support are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261431976
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current strength and conditioning in Southeast Asia: Practices, challenges, and emerging trends

Raja Mohammed Firhad Raja Azidin, Jad Adrian Washif, Nur Ikhwan Mohamad, Julian Lim et al.
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

Current strength and conditioning in Southeast Asia: Practices, challenges, and emerging trends

Raja Mohammed Firhad Raja Azidin, Jad Adrian Washif, Nur Ikhwan Mohamad, Julian Lim, C. Martyn Beaven, Jeffrey Pagaduan, Danny Lum, Erik Tan, Lian Yee Kok, Carl James
article en

Abstract

Strength and conditioning (S&C) is a field within exercise science that advocates evidence-based practice. As empirical knowledge evolves, translation of this knowledge into coaching practice is expected. However, knowledge translation remains challenging across many industries, particularly S&C, due to varying professional standards and limited resources. This study investigated current practices, challenges, and trends among S&C coaches in Southeast Asia (SEA). Seventy-one S&C coaches (87% male) from major sports organisations completed an online survey covering demographics, job satisfaction, motivation, programming knowledge, AI use, training principles, and exercise methods. Frequency analysis and Chi-square tests assessed data distribution and group differences. Most coaches held a bachelor's degree (93%) and S&C certification(s) (73%). Approximately half (49%) were satisfied with their roles, with mixed views on salary (38% satisfied vs. 38% dissatisfied). Passion (89%) was the primary motivator, while limited facilities (72%) and financial incentives (61%) were common challenges. Coaches reported greater proficiency in strength (87%) than conditioning (57%) programming. AI use within programming (e.g., ChatGPT) was limited (8%). Exercise selection was guided by training goals (93%), experience (87%), specificity (85%), and periodisation (80%). Load intensity and progression were primarily prescribed using percent-based (80% and 85%, respectively) and RPE-based (80%, 72%), with lower use of velocity-based methods (48%, 34%). Application of conventional, eccentric-, concentric-, and isometric-emphasis training were widespread (≥85%), with 100% using supersets for strength and hypertrophy development. S&C coaches in SEA demonstrated foundational qualifications, programming skills, and awareness of evidence-based methods, while emphasising athlete-centred approaches and communication. Structured professional development, consideration of AI-based tools, and organisational support are recommended.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Sultan Idris Education University (MY), The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Netaji Subhas National Institute of Sports (IN), Institute of High Performance Computing (SG), University of Glasgow Singapore (SG), University of Waikato (NZ), Victoria University (AU), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY), Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.