A typology of European farmers' viewpoints on soil management and an investigation of their context-dependency

Fostering the uptake of sustainable soil management practices requires a good understanding of farmers' motivations and priorities. To comprehensively assess these priorities, we identify and describe archetypical viewpoints on soil management among European crop farmers. We analyse interviews conducted with 132 farmers from five case study regions using Q-Methodology, a mixed quantitative and qualitative method. In addition, we apply and compare three different approaches to Q-Methodology and investigate the context-dependency of the identified viewpoints. Our results demonstrate the existence of up to five archetypical viewpoints on soil management. They are distinct in their focus on soil health, farm economics, social sustainability, traditional farming values, and risk avoidance, respectively. We find that these viewpoints are partly—but by no means fully—context-dependent. This implies that farmers' needs do not only vary due to natural farming conditions or farm structural aspects, but also due to subjective worldviews. Knowledge about archetypical viewpoints can help policy makers and advisory services to support farmers in a tailored manner. • We create a typology of European farmers' viewpoints on soil management • Five types emerge: soil, economic, sustainability, practical, and risk-averse farmers • Most types are stable across different approaches to Q-Methodology • Regional, biophysical, and farm structural context influence viewpoints

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109041
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A typology of European farmers' viewpoints on soil management and an investigation of their context-dependency

Michael Braito, Jenny Höckert, Marion Hacek, Christina Lundström et al.
Ecological Economics
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

A typology of European farmers' viewpoints on soil management and an investigation of their context-dependency

Michael Braito, Jenny Höckert, Marion Hacek, Christina Lundström, Heidi Leonhardt, Mette Tiselius, Mariella Schreiber, Nicole Bütikofer, Ernesto Lunar-Koch, Morten Graversgaard
article en

Abstract

Fostering the uptake of sustainable soil management practices requires a good understanding of farmers' motivations and priorities. To comprehensively assess these priorities, we identify and describe archetypical viewpoints on soil management among European crop farmers. We analyse interviews conducted with 132 farmers from five case study regions using Q-Methodology, a mixed quantitative and qualitative method. In addition, we apply and compare three different approaches to Q-Methodology and investigate the context-dependency of the identified viewpoints. Our results demonstrate the existence of up to five archetypical viewpoints on soil management. They are distinct in their focus on soil health, farm economics, social sustainability, traditional farming values, and risk avoidance, respectively. We find that these viewpoints are partly—but by no means fully—context-dependent. This implies that farmers' needs do not only vary due to natural farming conditions or farm structural aspects, but also due to subjective worldviews. Knowledge about archetypical viewpoints can help policy makers and advisory services to support farmers in a tailored manner. • We create a typology of European farmers' viewpoints on soil management • Five types emerge: soil, economic, sustainability, practical, and risk-averse farmers • Most types are stable across different approaches to Q-Methodology • Regional, biophysical, and farm structural context influence viewpoints

Ecological EconomicsVol. 247
Austrian Institute of Economic Research (AT), Aarhus University (DK), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Agroscope (CH), Federal Office for Agriculture (CH), BOKU University (AT)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.