Experimental Results and Numerical Modeling of Full-Scale Exterior Beam–Column Joints in Low-Standard RC Buildings

Among the most critical structural deficiencies observed in existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings worldwide are inadequately detailed beam–column joint regions, often constructed without reinforcement. Despite extensive research, the numerical modeling of these critical components still remains a major challenge, as a robust and universally accepted modeling framework has yet to be established, especially when extensive nonlinear analyses have to be performed. This study specifically addresses how joint reinforcement detailing governs the transition between flexure-dominated and shear-dominated joint behavior in non-ductile exterior sub-assemblages, and evaluates whether and how a simplified macro-model can reliably reproduce these mechanisms at full scale. The seismic behavior of exterior RC beam–column joints without adequate transverse reinforcement was first investigated herein through a full-scale experimental program. Five sub-assemblages were tested under quasi-static cyclic loading with increasing displacement history. They mainly differ for beam and column longitudinal reinforcement amount and joint panel (light or null) reinforcement layout, with equal geometric and material properties. The experimental results are first investigated in terms of global response, damage evolution, and energy dissipation capacity, comparing their seismic performance with varying beam or joint reinforcement. Then, nonlinear analyses were carried out by using a computationally efficient macro-modeling strategy in the OpenSees platform to numerically reproduce the observed response. The joint panel behavior was idealized through an empirical quadrilinear rotational spring, whereas flexural and fixed-end-rotation contributions are mechanically defined. The simulations reproduced the global load–drift envelopes, stiffness deterioration, and post-peak softening branch with satisfactory accuracy, although some discrepancies can be observed in the pinching effect. Nevertheless, the comparison between experimental and full-scale numerical results confirms that the adopted model provides reliable predictions of the cyclic response of non-ductile RC joints, also resulting in suitable solutions for extensive analyses as required, for example, for large-scale studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081638
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Results and Numerical Modeling of Full-Scale Exterior Beam–Column Joints in Low-Standard RC Buildings

Maria Teresa De Risi, Emmanouil Golias
Buildings
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Experimental Results and Numerical Modeling of Full-Scale Exterior Beam–Column Joints in Low-Standard RC Buildings

Maria Teresa De Risi, Emmanouil Golias
article en

Abstract

Among the most critical structural deficiencies observed in existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings worldwide are inadequately detailed beam–column joint regions, often constructed without reinforcement. Despite extensive research, the numerical modeling of these critical components still remains a major challenge, as a robust and universally accepted modeling framework has yet to be established, especially when extensive nonlinear analyses have to be performed. This study specifically addresses how joint reinforcement detailing governs the transition between flexure-dominated and shear-dominated joint behavior in non-ductile exterior sub-assemblages, and evaluates whether and how a simplified macro-model can reliably reproduce these mechanisms at full scale. The seismic behavior of exterior RC beam–column joints without adequate transverse reinforcement was first investigated herein through a full-scale experimental program. Five sub-assemblages were tested under quasi-static cyclic loading with increasing displacement history. They mainly differ for beam and column longitudinal reinforcement amount and joint panel (light or null) reinforcement layout, with equal geometric and material properties. The experimental results are first investigated in terms of global response, damage evolution, and energy dissipation capacity, comparing their seismic performance with varying beam or joint reinforcement. Then, nonlinear analyses were carried out by using a computationally efficient macro-modeling strategy in the OpenSees platform to numerically reproduce the observed response. The joint panel behavior was idealized through an empirical quadrilinear rotational spring, whereas flexural and fixed-end-rotation contributions are mechanically defined. The simulations reproduced the global load–drift envelopes, stiffness deterioration, and post-peak softening branch with satisfactory accuracy, although some discrepancies can be observed in the pinching effect. Nevertheless, the comparison between experimental and full-scale numerical results confirms that the adopted model provides reliable predictions of the cyclic response of non-ductile RC joints, also resulting in suitable solutions for extensive analyses as required, for example, for large-scale studies.

BuildingsVol. 16(8)
Democritus University of Thrace (GR), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.