Advancing the evaluation of learning health systems: a commentary

Around the world, health systems and governments are investing in Learning Health Systems (LHS) to accelerate the pace of science and improve services. These LHS are designed to continuously assess system performance, so as a practice is implemented, it can be evaluated and improved upon. However, evaluation of LHS is, as yet, underdeveloped in both theory and practice, particularly regarding the role of iteration as a core principle. This commentary is intended for LHS designers, evaluators, and funders, highlighting how integrating iterative, values-driven evaluation approaches early in LHS design and implementation can enhance learning and equity. It introduces “Soft Systems Methodology” along with values frameworks from Information Systems Development, which are then integrated into exemplar evaluation frameworks of LHS. Soft Systems Methodology centers iteration and integrates the importance of different interest-holders’ worldviews and values. It targets “problematical situations” which evolve over time and have many possible solutions based on different worldviews and values. Integrating Soft Systems Methodology into LHS development supports emerging matrix-based conceptualizations of LHS and helps maintain their core philosophy of continuous improvement and iteration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Health Systems
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmhs.2026.100220
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing the evaluation of learning health systems: a commentary

Tovah Cowan, Manuela Ferrari, Srividya N. Iyer
SSM - Health Systems
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Advancing the evaluation of learning health systems: a commentary

Tovah Cowan, Manuela Ferrari, Srividya N. Iyer
article en

Abstract

Around the world, health systems and governments are investing in Learning Health Systems (LHS) to accelerate the pace of science and improve services. These LHS are designed to continuously assess system performance, so as a practice is implemented, it can be evaluated and improved upon. However, evaluation of LHS is, as yet, underdeveloped in both theory and practice, particularly regarding the role of iteration as a core principle. This commentary is intended for LHS designers, evaluators, and funders, highlighting how integrating iterative, values-driven evaluation approaches early in LHS design and implementation can enhance learning and equity. It introduces “Soft Systems Methodology” along with values frameworks from Information Systems Development, which are then integrated into exemplar evaluation frameworks of LHS. Soft Systems Methodology centers iteration and integrates the importance of different interest-holders’ worldviews and values. It targets “problematical situations” which evolve over time and have many possible solutions based on different worldviews and values. Integrating Soft Systems Methodology into LHS development supports emerging matrix-based conceptualizations of LHS and helps maintain their core philosophy of continuous improvement and iteration.

SSM - Health SystemsVol. 7
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Canada Research Chairs, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.